Article

The Startup Growth Lifecycle: Re-inventing Leadership at Every Stage

October 13, 2024

Starting a company is exhilarating. The energy, passion, and creativity needed to get a startup off the ground are boundless, often resulting in rapid progress. But here’s the hard truth: what made you successful in the early days can sabotage you as you grow. There’s a breaking point—usually when your startup begins scaling—that demands a whole new approach.


Founders who fail to adapt often face disastrous outcomes. Think about how promising startups, like the infamous fall of Blackberry, once dominated their niche but crumbled under the weight of their own success because their founders were too fixated on early strategies and failed to scale. The tension is real, and many founders experience it but don’t know how to address it.


The Early Stages: A Playground for Mavericks


In the pre-seed and seed stages, founders are visionaries, hustling on every front. You’re wearing multiple hats—marketer, product designer, chief salesperson—and decision-making is quick and intuitive. These early days are defined by innovation, creativity, and the power of improvisation. Startups like Uber thrived in this environment, with Travis Kalanick’s adaptable, risk-taking leadership style playing a significant role in those formative stages.


But here’s the twist: as crucial as these qualities are, they become liabilities if not balanced as the company matures. Founders often fall into the trap of assuming that the instincts that helped them launch their company will also be their ticket to scaling. Spoiler: they won’t.


The Growth Stage: From Visionary to Strategist


As the startup enters the traction stage, the founder’s role begins to shift dramatically. This is where companies like Boo .com struggled, with Ernst Malmsten’s lavish spending and lack of focus on profitability spiraling into unchecked ambition and poor strategic management. Boo .com, a high-profile online fashion retailer that launched in the late 1990s, raised significant capital but ultimately failed due to a combination of factors, including overspending, a lack of focus on profitability, and an inability to adapt to the market's demands. This aligns with the challenges that startups often face during the growth stage, where they need to transition from a focus on innovation and customer acquisition to building sustainable systems and processes. Founders must pivot from being hands-on doers to becoming big-picture thinkers.


Key Challenge: Scaling isn’t just about adding people or increasing revenue—it’s about building systems that can handle growth.


Example: Consider a startup founder who once thrived by being decisive and intuitive. Suddenly, those same strengths become weaknesses. At this stage, data-driven decision-making, clear objectives, and team alignment become more important than gut instinct. At fab .com for example, the founder initially assumed that a flash-sales model for designer goods was enough. Fab .com's initial success was based on a niche market strategy, but as it expanded, it faced challenges in managing inventory, maintaining customer satisfaction, and adapting to the changing e-commerce landscape. This example highlights the importance of data-driven decision-making, clear objectives, and team alignment during the growth stage. It wasn’t until later, with customer feedback and market validation, that they realized the need for a much broader platform. This critical pivot fueled their continued growth.


You can no longer make decisions in isolation. Founders who don't delegate or rely on the insights of their growing teams are bottlenecking their own companies. In the early days, this might have worked, but in the traction phase, failure to delegate and empower others can crush a startup’s momentum.


Scaling Stage: Collaborative Leadership and Risk Management


As your startup moves into the expansion stage, you’re no longer a scrappy underdog; you’re playing in the big leagues. But here’s where many founders get stuck. Scaling is about efficiency, consistency, and letting go of control.


Key Challenge: Founders must move from solo decision-makers to collaborative leaders. While in the early days, your strength lay in your ability to do everything yourself, this will no longer cut it. The shift from risk-taker to risk-manager becomes critical. Founders need to balance their instinct for innovation with a more calculated, process-driven approach. The introduction of processes, governance structures, and professional management becomes essential to avoid burnout and chaos.


Consider Zynga under Mark Pincus: initially, his aggressive, growth-at-all-costs mentality helped the company conquer markets globally. However, as Zynga grew, that same aggressive attitude led to internal cultural issues, regulatory challenges, and reputational damage. This illustrates the need for founders to transition from risk-takers to risk-managers during the scaling stage and to balance their instinct for innovation with a more calculated, process-driven approach. The inability to transition from a disruptive force to a company with proper checks and balances left Zynga in need of an overhaul.


Founders who thrive at this stage are those who not only manage risk but also develop emotional intelligence. Successful founders become socially astute, supporting their teams, creating a positive culture, and understanding that leadership isn’t just about driving results but also about fostering a thriving environment for long-term success.


Continuous Growth: The Leadership Evolution


At the continuous growth stage, startups that survive are those with founders who have fully evolved their leadership styles. You’re no longer in the business of product launches and rapid pivots but rather in sustaining growth, profitability, and strategic differentiation. Your new job is governance, and the decisions you make today must focus on long-term sustainability. This is where companies like Yahoo! struggled, with Jerry Yang's inability to adapt to the changing landscape of the internet industry and his failure to embrace the rise of social media and mobile led to the company's downfall.


Key Challenge: Long-term planning and vision become more important than short-term wins. Founders must transition into CEOs who set the tone for culture, governance, and sustainable growth. This often involves a collaborative decision-making style, focusing on bringing diverse perspectives together to fuel innovation while avoiding stagnation.


Here’s where many companies fail: the founder remains overly attached to the “startup hustle.” This is no longer the place for it. Founders must shift from inspirational figures to developers of talent. Leadership is now about making your people successful, not just driving product success.


What’s at Stake?

If you fail to adapt, your startup won’t just stall—it could implode. Take the case of Pets .com, where Julie Wainwright, unwilling to let go of her early vision and failing to adapt to the realities of the pet supply industry and scaling, steered the company into disaster. In contrast, those who successfully pivot at each stage—from visionary to strategist to risk manager and mentor—will lead their startups to sustained success.


Success in the early stages of a startup often reinforces behaviors that can be destructive as the company scales. What got you here won’t get you there.


Are You Ready to Evolve?

So, ask yourself: Are you ready to let go of what made you a successful founder to become the strategic leader your startup needs? Are you willing to delegate, build systems, and adapt your leadership style as your company grows? If not, you may find yourself standing in the way of your own success. The future of your startup depends on it.



It’s time to rethink your approach to leadership—before it’s too late.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

e
By Rich Hagberg August 9, 2025
Introduction: The Brutal Truth About Change If you’re leading a company, here’s one brutal truth you can’t dodge: resistance to change isn’t just inevitable—it’s a gift. Most leaders don’t see it that way. They treat it like an obstacle to bulldoze, something to out-argue, out-maneuver, or silence. But resistance, if you know how to read it, is a living, breathing diagnostic tool. Every objection, every sideways comment in a hallway, every moment of awkward silence in a meeting—it’s all data. It tells you where the trust gaps are, where the communication breakdowns have happened, and where your people’s unspoken fears live. If you ignore that data, you’re flying blind. The hard numbers back this up: more than 70% of organizational change initiatives fail, not because the strategy was flawed, but because leaders underestimated what it would take to guide people through the emotional turbulence of transformation. If you want your next big initiative to succeed, the shift starts here: stop seeing resistance as the enemy, and start listening to what it’s telling you. When you do, you’ll discover that resistance isn’t a wall to break down—it’s a map showing you exactly where to go next. 1. Rethink Resistance: It’s Data, Not Defiance Let’s flip the lens. When people resist, they’re rarely doing it for sport. They’re sending up flares. They’re telling you something’s unclear, untested, or untrusted. For example, I worked with a CEO rolling out a sweeping technology overhaul. His first instinct when his managers hesitated was frustration—until we sat down and dissected the resistance. It turned out the managers weren’t doubting the technology; they were worried about the gap between the training timeline and the rollout date. They didn’t fear change—they feared being set up to fail.  When you stop labeling resistance as “non-compliance” and start treating it like intelligence gathering, you find it points to the very levers you can pull to move the change forward.
How
By Rich Hagberg August 1, 2025
Most startup founders are brilliant at innovation, disruption, and blazing new trails. They're visionaries, incredibly driven, and fiercely independent. Unfortunately, those same powerful traits often sabotage their ability to foster genuine collaboration—a critical ingredient in startup success. I've spent decades coaching founders, and one of the biggest blind spots I've observed is the gap between what founders naturally do well and what's required to create truly collaborative cultures. Understanding these tendencies—and knowing how to counter them—can mean the difference between startup stagnation and breakout growth. High Independence, Low Collaboration Founders thrive on independence. They love breaking rules, ignoring boundaries, and pushing limits. But independence can quickly morph into isolation. The very idea of slowing down to seek consensus or accommodate team input feels restrictive, even suffocating. Implications: This independent streak inadvertently sidelines team members, suppresses input, and reduces engagement. Talented people quickly learn their ideas don't matter, and teams become passive or defensive. Actions to Counter: Practice deliberately inclusive decision-making. Clearly define which decisions you'll make alone and where you'll solicit team input. Regularly check in to see if team members feel heard and involved. Dominance Isn’t Always Dominant Many founders naturally take a commanding stance. Their assertiveness, directness, and forcefulness can spark initial progress but, over time, it creates resistance. When team members feel steamrolled or fearful of speaking up, creativity vanishes. Implications: A dominant style shuts down communication, makes feedback difficult, and kills the very collaboration needed for sustained innovation. Actions to Counter: Make intentional space for quieter team members to speak. Foster psychological safety by modeling vulnerability and humility Balance assertiveness with curiosity—actively seek feedback rather than waiting for it. The Curse of Poor Delegation Delegation isn't just handing off tasks—it's handing off trust. But founders notoriously struggle with this, often believing only they can execute properly. Every task not delegated reinforces the message that the team isn’t capable. Implications: Poor delegation creates bottlenecks, slows execution, and demoralizes talented employees who feel undervalued and micromanaged. Actions to Counter: Start small by delegating lower-risk tasks clearly and thoroughly. Regularly check your impulses to micromanage; remind yourself why you hired capable people. Invest in mentoring and coaching rather than controlling. Communication Breakdown Founders are famously impatient. They think fast, act fast, and often communicate quickly or incompletely. What seems obvious to them might be totally unclear to their team. Implications: Poor communication creates ambiguity, confusion, and frustration, grinding collaboration to a halt. Teams waste energy guessing expectations rather than innovating. Actions to Counter: Slow down to clearly articulate the "why" behind your decisions. Confirm understanding by asking team members to reflect back their interpretations. Regularly solicit feedback on your communication style and clarity. Arrogance: The Silent Collaboration Killer Confidence is crucial. But confidence unchecked can veer into arrogance, leading founders to dismiss feedback, overlook critical insights, and alienate key contributors. Implications: Arrogance destroys trust, stifles dialogue, and creates a toxic environment where collaboration is impossible. Actions to Counter: Intentionally invite critique and respond openly and constructively. Regularly acknowledge your mistakes publicly to model humility. Actively seek alternative viewpoints before finalizing decisions. Conflict Avoidance (or Aggression) Many founders fall into two extreme camps: conflict avoiders or conflict initiators. Both extremes are deadly to collaboration. Avoiding conflict leaves critical issues unresolved. Aggressive conflict handling creates resentment and fear. Implications: Poorly managed conflict erodes team cohesion, undermines trust, and can spiral into prolonged dysfunction. Actions to Counter: Establish clear, structured conflict resolution processes. Practice direct yet respectful conflict conversations. Use neutral facilitation for emotionally charged discussions. Systems Thinking vs. Reactive Planning Startups prize agility and adaptability. But too much short-term thinking neglects the processes and structures that sustain collaboration. Without clear systems, teams fall into chaos. Implications: Reactive planning leads to burnout, inefficiency, and frustration as team members constantly fight fires rather than building strategically. Actions to Counter: Balance short-term agility with consistent investment in systems and clear processes. Regularly revisit and improve structures as your company scales. Empower process-oriented thinkers in your organization to build effective systems. Workaholism and Burnout Culture Founders set the pace. But when founders turn workaholic, they unknowingly create an environment of exhaustion, anxiety, and diminished psychological safety. Exhausted teams are seldom collaborative. Implications: Productivity drops, innovation dries up, and talented employees start to leave. Actions to Counter: Actively model sustainable work-life balance. Publicly recognize and reward collaborative, balanced behaviors. Regularly monitor signs of burnout and intervene early. Ambiguity Isn’t Always Your Friend Founders typically tolerate ambiguity better than most. But your team needs clarity and direction. Too much ambiguity creates stress and undermines collaborative execution. Implications: Team paralysis, lack of initiative, and increased frustration. Actions to Counter: Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Regularly ask your team what clarity they need to be effective. Balance your tolerance for ambiguity with your team’s genuine need for guidance. The Collaboration Paradox Founders face a paradox. The same traits that fuel their success—independence, assertiveness, rapid execution—also sabotage the collaborative environments crucial for scaling. Acknowledging this paradox is the first step. The second is intentionally adopting behaviors that might feel unnatural at first: fostering inclusive communication, delegating with trust, managing conflict constructively, investing in systems thinking, and balancing your independent streak with genuine empathy.  The good news? These skills are learnable. Great founders don’t have to become entirely different people; they simply need to expand their toolkit. Start today by picking just one area and committing to small, consistent improvements. Your team and your startup—will thank you.
The Recognition Paradox: 
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
By Rich Hagberg July 31, 2025
The Recognition Paradox: Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
ALL ARTICLES