Article

Extraordinary Results Decoded: Why Leader Behavior and Personality Matter

November 29, 2024
Decoded: How leadership behavior and personality explain extraordinary results.

Leadership advice is everywhere—seminars, books, podcasts, your neighbor who thinks their PTA experience is transferable to running a Fortune 500 company. But what really separates leaders who get results from those who just "lead" meetings that could’ve been emails? Let’s dig into the principles that drive real productivity and results, complete with actionable insights and (only) business examples to keep this interesting. These insights come from a detailed analysis of personality, 360 ratings and stakeholder comments on leaders who were rated high on overall leadership effectiveness, who were also rated high on results and productivity.


1. Commitment and Determination: Not Just Buzzwords


Ever notice how some leaders seem to have an unshakeable determination to achieve their goals? They’re the ones who inspire their teams by being the first to roll up their sleeves (figuratively or literally) and wade into the mess of challenges. This isn’t about looking busy—it’s about showing you’re all in.


Commitment is contagious. When a leader stays laser-focused on a goal, the team feels compelled to match that intensity. Productivity skyrockets because distractions get the cold shoulder.


Example: Howard Schultz, when returning to Starbucks, didn’t just point fingers at what was wrong. He got in the trenches, closing stores for barista training and reminding everyone that Starbucks wasn’t just selling coffee—it was selling an experience. That level of focus transformed the company’s trajectory.


2. Clear Objectives and Follow-Through: Be the Human GPS


You know what makes people unproductive? Confusion. Ambiguous goals are like bad Wi-Fi—everyone flounders, and nothing gets done. Great leaders set crystal-clear objectives and then (here’s the kicker) follow through. It’s not glamorous, but it works.


Clear goals save time. Teams spend less energy figuring out what’s important and more energy doing it. Follow-through adds credibility, turning promises into results.


Example: Indra Nooyi at PepsiCo had a knack for setting bold goals, like pivoting the company toward healthier products without alienating Dorito lovers. By clearly defining the “how” behind her vision and checking progress relentlessly, she reshaped the brand for long-term success.


3. Empowerment and Delegation: The Anti-Micromanager Approach


Look, no one thrives under a leader who hovers like a helicopter parent over a science fair project. Delegation isn’t about handing off grunt work; it’s about giving people ownership of something meaningful and trusting them not to tank it.


When team members feel ownership, they take initiative. Empowered employees innovate, problem-solve, and—here’s the magic—free up the leader to focus on bigger fish.


Example: Anne Mulcahy took over Xerox when it was flirting with bankruptcy. Instead of hoarding decisions, she empowered her team to tackle specific challenges, creating a collective sense of responsibility that saved the company.


4. Emotional Intelligence and Integrity: No One Follows a Jerk


If you think “emotional intelligence” sounds soft, think again. EQ is the grease that keeps the wheels of leadership turning smoothly. Throw in integrity, and you’ve got a combo that builds trust and keeps drama out of the workplace.


Teams work harder for leaders they respect and trust. A leader who can read the room—and themselves—is less likely to create friction and more likely to inspire collaboration.


Example: Mary Barra of General Motors transformed a culture once notorious for finger-pointing by leaning heavily on transparency and integrity. When the ignition-switch crisis hit, she didn’t dodge responsibility; she owned it, winning back trust from both her employees and the public.


5. Adaptability and Problem-Solving: The MacGyvers of Business


If you’re waiting for the world to hand you a perfectly paved path to success, you’re in the wrong game. Great leaders adapt, pivot, and occasionally duct-tape things together while figuring out a better solution.


Adaptability keeps momentum going when the unexpected hits. Problem-solving leaders ensure teams don’t grind to a halt at the first sign of trouble.


Example: Alan Mulally took the wheel at Ford when it was careening toward disaster. Instead of panicking, he streamlined operations, kept his cool, and introduced solutions that helped Ford avoid a government bailout. Adaptability, for the win.


6. Building a Cohesive Team: Herding Cats with Grace


The best leaders don’t just manage teams; they build them. Creating a cohesive unit is part science (understanding group dynamics) and part art (knowing how to handle Frank from accounting without losing your cool).


Cohesive teams communicate better, collaborate more effectively, and waste less time. It’s like oiling the gears of a machine—everything runs smoother.


Example: Patagonia’s founder, Yvon Chouinard, built not just a business but a tribe. By creating a workplace culture that emphasized shared values and collaboration, he ensured employees were as passionate about the mission as he was.


7. Efficiency and Time Management: Stop Wasting Everyone’s Time


Ever sit through a meeting and wonder why you’re there? Efficient leaders don’t let that happen. They prioritize ruthlessly, focus on what moves the needle, and cut the fluff.


Efficiency keeps teams focused on high-impact work. Productivity goes up because time isn’t squandered on things that don’t matter.


Example: Tim Cook at Apple is a master of operational efficiency, streamlining processes to keep the company’s massive machine running smoothly while fostering relentless innovation.


8. Innovation and Creativity: Cultivating the “Aha” Moments


Being innovative isn’t about having one great idea; it’s about creating an environment where ideas can flourish. The best leaders set the stage for innovation by encouraging experimentation—even if it means embracing a little failure.


Innovation drives growth and keeps teams engaged. Leaders who champion creativity unlock potential breakthroughs that competitors only dream of.


Example: Sheryl Sandberg helped Facebook move beyond its college-centric roots by championing new revenue models, including its now-massive advertising platform.


9. Communication and Influence: Less “Blah,” More “Aha”


Ever been inspired by a boring PowerPoint? Me neither. Great leaders know that communication isn’t just about relaying information—it’s about creating connection and buy-in.


Effective communication aligns teams, reduces misunderstandings, and builds enthusiasm. Influence makes people want to follow you, not just because they have to.


Example: Oprah Winfrey built a media empire by connecting with audiences and employees alike. Her ability to inspire trust and enthusiasm was foundational to her success.


10. Resilience and Positivity: Keeping Calm in the Chaos


If you think resilience is just a personal virtue, think again. It’s a productivity booster. Teams mirror their leaders, so when the leader keeps their cool and focuses on solutions, the team does the same.


Resilience keeps teams steady during turbulence, while positivity keeps them motivated to keep pushing forward.


Example: Howard Schultz (yes, him again) didn’t just bring coffee to America; he brought optimism to a struggling Starbucks. His resilience and ability to inspire helped the brand thrive during tough times.


Conclusion


Leadership isn’t about checking boxes; it’s about creating an environment where people want to excel. When you combine focus, adaptability, empathy, and a little humor, you not only drive results—you make people glad to follow you. So, go on. Be the kind of leader people tell stories about—not the one they roll their eyes at during happy hour.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

e
By Rich Hagberg August 9, 2025
Introduction: The Brutal Truth About Change If you’re leading a company, here’s one brutal truth you can’t dodge: resistance to change isn’t just inevitable—it’s a gift. Most leaders don’t see it that way. They treat it like an obstacle to bulldoze, something to out-argue, out-maneuver, or silence. But resistance, if you know how to read it, is a living, breathing diagnostic tool. Every objection, every sideways comment in a hallway, every moment of awkward silence in a meeting—it’s all data. It tells you where the trust gaps are, where the communication breakdowns have happened, and where your people’s unspoken fears live. If you ignore that data, you’re flying blind. The hard numbers back this up: more than 70% of organizational change initiatives fail, not because the strategy was flawed, but because leaders underestimated what it would take to guide people through the emotional turbulence of transformation. If you want your next big initiative to succeed, the shift starts here: stop seeing resistance as the enemy, and start listening to what it’s telling you. When you do, you’ll discover that resistance isn’t a wall to break down—it’s a map showing you exactly where to go next. 1. Rethink Resistance: It’s Data, Not Defiance Let’s flip the lens. When people resist, they’re rarely doing it for sport. They’re sending up flares. They’re telling you something’s unclear, untested, or untrusted. For example, I worked with a CEO rolling out a sweeping technology overhaul. His first instinct when his managers hesitated was frustration—until we sat down and dissected the resistance. It turned out the managers weren’t doubting the technology; they were worried about the gap between the training timeline and the rollout date. They didn’t fear change—they feared being set up to fail.  When you stop labeling resistance as “non-compliance” and start treating it like intelligence gathering, you find it points to the very levers you can pull to move the change forward.
How
By Rich Hagberg August 1, 2025
Most startup founders are brilliant at innovation, disruption, and blazing new trails. They're visionaries, incredibly driven, and fiercely independent. Unfortunately, those same powerful traits often sabotage their ability to foster genuine collaboration—a critical ingredient in startup success. I've spent decades coaching founders, and one of the biggest blind spots I've observed is the gap between what founders naturally do well and what's required to create truly collaborative cultures. Understanding these tendencies—and knowing how to counter them—can mean the difference between startup stagnation and breakout growth. High Independence, Low Collaboration Founders thrive on independence. They love breaking rules, ignoring boundaries, and pushing limits. But independence can quickly morph into isolation. The very idea of slowing down to seek consensus or accommodate team input feels restrictive, even suffocating. Implications: This independent streak inadvertently sidelines team members, suppresses input, and reduces engagement. Talented people quickly learn their ideas don't matter, and teams become passive or defensive. Actions to Counter: Practice deliberately inclusive decision-making. Clearly define which decisions you'll make alone and where you'll solicit team input. Regularly check in to see if team members feel heard and involved. Dominance Isn’t Always Dominant Many founders naturally take a commanding stance. Their assertiveness, directness, and forcefulness can spark initial progress but, over time, it creates resistance. When team members feel steamrolled or fearful of speaking up, creativity vanishes. Implications: A dominant style shuts down communication, makes feedback difficult, and kills the very collaboration needed for sustained innovation. Actions to Counter: Make intentional space for quieter team members to speak. Foster psychological safety by modeling vulnerability and humility Balance assertiveness with curiosity—actively seek feedback rather than waiting for it. The Curse of Poor Delegation Delegation isn't just handing off tasks—it's handing off trust. But founders notoriously struggle with this, often believing only they can execute properly. Every task not delegated reinforces the message that the team isn’t capable. Implications: Poor delegation creates bottlenecks, slows execution, and demoralizes talented employees who feel undervalued and micromanaged. Actions to Counter: Start small by delegating lower-risk tasks clearly and thoroughly. Regularly check your impulses to micromanage; remind yourself why you hired capable people. Invest in mentoring and coaching rather than controlling. Communication Breakdown Founders are famously impatient. They think fast, act fast, and often communicate quickly or incompletely. What seems obvious to them might be totally unclear to their team. Implications: Poor communication creates ambiguity, confusion, and frustration, grinding collaboration to a halt. Teams waste energy guessing expectations rather than innovating. Actions to Counter: Slow down to clearly articulate the "why" behind your decisions. Confirm understanding by asking team members to reflect back their interpretations. Regularly solicit feedback on your communication style and clarity. Arrogance: The Silent Collaboration Killer Confidence is crucial. But confidence unchecked can veer into arrogance, leading founders to dismiss feedback, overlook critical insights, and alienate key contributors. Implications: Arrogance destroys trust, stifles dialogue, and creates a toxic environment where collaboration is impossible. Actions to Counter: Intentionally invite critique and respond openly and constructively. Regularly acknowledge your mistakes publicly to model humility. Actively seek alternative viewpoints before finalizing decisions. Conflict Avoidance (or Aggression) Many founders fall into two extreme camps: conflict avoiders or conflict initiators. Both extremes are deadly to collaboration. Avoiding conflict leaves critical issues unresolved. Aggressive conflict handling creates resentment and fear. Implications: Poorly managed conflict erodes team cohesion, undermines trust, and can spiral into prolonged dysfunction. Actions to Counter: Establish clear, structured conflict resolution processes. Practice direct yet respectful conflict conversations. Use neutral facilitation for emotionally charged discussions. Systems Thinking vs. Reactive Planning Startups prize agility and adaptability. But too much short-term thinking neglects the processes and structures that sustain collaboration. Without clear systems, teams fall into chaos. Implications: Reactive planning leads to burnout, inefficiency, and frustration as team members constantly fight fires rather than building strategically. Actions to Counter: Balance short-term agility with consistent investment in systems and clear processes. Regularly revisit and improve structures as your company scales. Empower process-oriented thinkers in your organization to build effective systems. Workaholism and Burnout Culture Founders set the pace. But when founders turn workaholic, they unknowingly create an environment of exhaustion, anxiety, and diminished psychological safety. Exhausted teams are seldom collaborative. Implications: Productivity drops, innovation dries up, and talented employees start to leave. Actions to Counter: Actively model sustainable work-life balance. Publicly recognize and reward collaborative, balanced behaviors. Regularly monitor signs of burnout and intervene early. Ambiguity Isn’t Always Your Friend Founders typically tolerate ambiguity better than most. But your team needs clarity and direction. Too much ambiguity creates stress and undermines collaborative execution. Implications: Team paralysis, lack of initiative, and increased frustration. Actions to Counter: Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Regularly ask your team what clarity they need to be effective. Balance your tolerance for ambiguity with your team’s genuine need for guidance. The Collaboration Paradox Founders face a paradox. The same traits that fuel their success—independence, assertiveness, rapid execution—also sabotage the collaborative environments crucial for scaling. Acknowledging this paradox is the first step. The second is intentionally adopting behaviors that might feel unnatural at first: fostering inclusive communication, delegating with trust, managing conflict constructively, investing in systems thinking, and balancing your independent streak with genuine empathy.  The good news? These skills are learnable. Great founders don’t have to become entirely different people; they simply need to expand their toolkit. Start today by picking just one area and committing to small, consistent improvements. Your team and your startup—will thank you.
The Recognition Paradox: 
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
By Rich Hagberg July 31, 2025
The Recognition Paradox: Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
ALL ARTICLES