Article

The Hidden Dangers of Startup Leadership: 10 Founder Traits That Undermine Growth

November 18, 2024

Startups might be thrilling, but the cold truth is that most of them fail—and it’s often the founders themselves who unknowingly set the stage for collapse. After over 40 years of coaching founders and conducting extensive research on the financial outcomes of 122 startups, I’ve come to a sobering conclusion: the traits that drive founders to launch and grow companies are often the same traits that cause them to sabotage their own success. My research, I looked at over 50 personality traits and 46 leadership competencies on 360 ratings and then looked at financial performance as measured by MOIC (Multiple of Invested Capital). This revealed a stark truth—founder behavior can either drive extraordinary returns or lead to catastrophic failure.


 But here’s the thing: the damage goes far beyond financial results. When a founder struggles with certain destructive traits, it’s not just the investors who feel the impact—employees, customers, partners, and the broader community all suffer. These self-sabotaging behaviors ripple outward, slowly eroding the business from within. The tension between a founder’s strengths and their weaknesses can make or break the company, impacting every stakeholder who depends on its success.


 If you’re a founder, employee, investor, or someone with a stake in a growing company, this isn’t just about making the numbers work. It’s about building a business that sustains growth and positively impacts everyone involved. But when founders don’t get out of their own way, the fallout can be widespread and irreversible. The following are 10 common traits among founders that can fuel early success but eventually limit a startup’s ability to scale—and even worse, lead to failure and cause deep, personal costs for everyone.


1. Impulsivity: The Fast Lane to Team Burnout and Customer Confusion


In the startup world, agility is a prized quality. Founders often pride themselves on being quick to seize opportunities and pivot. But when impulsivity takes over—when every new idea becomes a priority without careful consideration—the entire company can lose its focus.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees feel the brunt of impulsive decisions. Constantly shifting priorities lead to burnout as they struggle to keep up with the latest direction. Customers get confused when the product or service changes frequently, leading to dissatisfaction and lost trust. Investors, of course, see wasted resources and a lack of focus, which directly affects returns.


What’s the Fix? Before jumping into a new idea, create a system of checks. Implement a "cooling-off" period where you evaluate whether the new initiative aligns with long-term goals. Use a trusted advisory group or senior team members to review the impact of each decision, ensuring it benefits the company as a whole before it derails the team’s focus.


2. Control Freak Tendencies: Creating a Founder Bottleneck That Frustrates Everyone


Founders who feel the need to oversee every decision often create a culture where nothing moves without their approval. This might work in the early days when a founder can handle everything, but as the company grows, micromanagement becomes a major issue.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees feel disempowered and stifled by a lack of autonomy. Talented team members often leave because they don’t feel trusted or valued. Customers may experience delays in product releases or service because decisions are constantly bottlenecked at the founder level. Investors see a business that can’t scale because the founder refuses to let go.


What’s the Fix? Start delegating, even with small tasks. Build a leadership structure that allows for independent decision-making and set clear guidelines for who’s responsible for what. Trust your team’s ability to execute without you hovering over every detail. Allow leaders to grow within the company by empowering them to make key decisions.


3. Poor Conflict Resolution: Poisoning Team Culture and Alienating Customers


Conflict is inevitable in any startup, but how it’s handled can make or break the company. Some founders avoid conflict at all costs, allowing tensions to fester, while others react aggressively, shutting down any constructive dialogue.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees feel unsafe in an environment where conflicts are mishandled or ignored, leading to low morale and high turnover. Customers may pick up on these internal tensions, especially if they lead to poor service or inconsistent products. Partners and suppliers may hesitate to work with a company known for a toxic internal culture, hurting growth opportunities. Investors lose confidence when they see leadership incapable of fostering healthy team dynamics.


What’s the Fix? Commit to learning conflict resolution techniques, whether through training or coaching. Build a culture where feedback is encouraged, and disagreements are resolved constructively. Model healthy conflict resolution by addressing issues head-on rather than avoiding them and ensure that your leadership team follows suit.


4. Narcissism and Arrogance: Alienating Everyone Who Helps You Succeed


It’s no secret that many founders are confident to the point of arrogance. While a strong belief in your vision is critical, being dismissive of others’ input or assuming that you’re always the smartest person in the room can severely damage your relationships.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees quickly become disengaged when their insights are ignored, especially if they feel their contributions are undervalued. This leads to poor team morale and high turnover. Customers suffer when a founder’s arrogance blinds them to market feedback, resulting in products that miss the mark. Partners and industry peers may avoid collaborating with an overly arrogant leader, limiting growth opportunities. Investors shy away from founders who think they know it all, as this attitude often blocks learning and adaptability.


What’s the Fix? Practice humility and active listening. Regularly seek input from your team and advisors, and take it seriously. Surround yourself with people who will challenge your assumptions. Show your team that their ideas matter by acknowledging their contributions and acting on their insights when appropriate.


5. Fear of Letting Go: Stifling Growth and Talent Development


Many founders are driven by a fear that if they hand off responsibilities, things will fall apart. This fear can manifest as micromanagement or an inability to delegate, which suffocates the company’s ability to grow.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees feel micromanaged and become frustrated with their lack of autonomy and growth opportunities. The company becomes reliant on the founder for every major decision, limiting the development of a capable leadership team. Customers may experience slower responses or delays as the founder juggles too many tasks. Investors recognize that without delegation, scaling is impossible, limiting their return on investment.


What’s the Fix? Shift your mindset from "doing" to "leading." Identify key people who can take on leadership roles, and mentor them to handle responsibilities. Let them lead without constantly stepping in. Trust your systems and your people, and focus on long-term strategy rather than day-to-day operations.


6. Lack of Focus: Disorienting the Team and Confusing the Market


Founders are often idea generators, which can be a blessing and a curse. A lack of focus, however, means constantly shifting goals and priorities. While new ideas might seem exciting, without a clear direction, the company can lose its way.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees become overwhelmed when priorities change too often, leading to confusion and burnout. The market may struggle to understand what your company actually does if messaging and product offerings change frequently. Customers may lose faith in your company’s consistency. Investors notice a lack of discipline and focus, which signals an inability to scale.


What’s the Fix? Implement a clear framework for setting priorities. Use methods like OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) to keep the team aligned on specific, measurable goals. Before launching new initiatives, ensure they fit into the broader strategy. Communicate these priorities clearly and often to avoid confusion.


7. Inability to Handle Stress: Creating a Toxic Culture That Affects Everyone


Running a startup is inherently stressful, but founders who don’t manage stress well often create a tense, high-pressure work environment that trickles down to the entire organization.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees feel constantly stressed and burned out in a high-pressure culture, leading to high turnover and low productivity. A stressed-out founder may make poor decisions, which can damage customer relationships and erode trust in the company. Investors worry about leadership sustainability when they see a founder on the edge of burnout.


What’s the Fix? Prioritize stress management by setting clear work-life boundaries for yourself and your team. Adopt stress-reduction practices like meditation or regular exercise. Build a leadership team that shares responsibilities to reduce the pressure on any one person. Ensure that your company culture supports balance and well-being, not just hustle.


8. Inconsistent Trust in Others: Undermining Team Cohesion


Some founders trust only a select few within their organization, which leads to unequal power dynamics. The inner circle gets more responsibility, while others are left feeling sidelined.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees who aren’t part of the “trusted few” become disengaged, feeling that they don’t have a real stake in the company’s success. This lack of trust stifles innovation and collaboration, preventing the company from reaching its full potential. Customers may sense instability or inconsistency in service when decision-making is bottlenecked among a select few. Investors recognize that an over-reliance on a small inner circle can limit scalability and sustainability.


What’s the Fix? Build trust across the organization by empowering a broader group of employees to make decisions. Create a culture of transparency, where responsibilities are clearly defined and trust is distributed evenly. Encourage collaboration between teams and leaders at all levels.


9. Avoiding Accountability: Fostering a Culture of Mediocrity

Founders who blur the lines between friendship and leadership often struggle with accountability. They may avoid holding themselves or others responsible for underperformance, which creates a culture where mediocrity thrives.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees become demotivated when they see underperformance go unchecked, leading to inconsistent results and low morale. A lack of accountability hurts customer experience, as sloppy work or poor service isn’t corrected. Investors are alarmed when they see a lack of discipline, which suggests that the company won’t meet its targets.


What’s the Fix? Implement clear performance metrics for yourself and your team and hold regular reviews to ensure accountability. Address underperformance head-on and create systems for recognizing and rewarding excellence. This helps to maintain a high standard across the board.


10. Poor Emotional Intelligence: Driving a Wedge Between Leadership and Teams


Founders who lack emotional intelligence (EQ) struggle to connect with their teams. They may be brilliant strategists, but if they don’t understand or manage their own emotions—or those of others—they’ll struggle to lead effectively.


Stakeholder Impact: Employees disengage in environments where they feel misunderstood or undervalued. This leads to low morale, poor communication, and high turnover. Customers suffer when the lack of emotional intelligence leads to bad decisions or poor handling of complaints. Investors know that a company with poor internal dynamics will struggle to execute effectively and grow.


What’s the Fix? Invest in developing your emotional intelligence by working with a coach or taking EQ training. Practice active listening and empathy with your team. Regularly check in with employees not just on performance, but also on well-being. Creating strong emotional connections within your team builds trust and fosters a positive work culture.


Conclusion: Founders, It’s Not Just About You

It’s easy to focus on numbers when running a startup, but success is about more than revenue or valuation. It’s about how well you lead, and leadership is a skill that can make or break the experience for everyone involved—employees, customers, partners, and investors alike. The traits that make you a scrappy, bold founder might also be the very traits that sabotage your company’s long-term success.


Recognize these behaviors in yourself? Good. That’s the first step to addressing them. Whether it’s learning to delegate, developing emotional intelligence, or managing stress, improving yourself as a leader will ripple out to everyone who’s counting on your company to succeed.



You owe it to your employees, your customers, your investors—and ultimately, to yourself—to be the best leader you can be. The stakes are high, and the consequences of self-sabotage can be devastating. But with the right self-awareness and action, you can turn things around and lead your company to success that benefits everyone.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

e
By Rich Hagberg August 9, 2025
Introduction: The Brutal Truth About Change If you’re leading a company, here’s one brutal truth you can’t dodge: resistance to change isn’t just inevitable—it’s a gift. Most leaders don’t see it that way. They treat it like an obstacle to bulldoze, something to out-argue, out-maneuver, or silence. But resistance, if you know how to read it, is a living, breathing diagnostic tool. Every objection, every sideways comment in a hallway, every moment of awkward silence in a meeting—it’s all data. It tells you where the trust gaps are, where the communication breakdowns have happened, and where your people’s unspoken fears live. If you ignore that data, you’re flying blind. The hard numbers back this up: more than 70% of organizational change initiatives fail, not because the strategy was flawed, but because leaders underestimated what it would take to guide people through the emotional turbulence of transformation. If you want your next big initiative to succeed, the shift starts here: stop seeing resistance as the enemy, and start listening to what it’s telling you. When you do, you’ll discover that resistance isn’t a wall to break down—it’s a map showing you exactly where to go next. 1. Rethink Resistance: It’s Data, Not Defiance Let’s flip the lens. When people resist, they’re rarely doing it for sport. They’re sending up flares. They’re telling you something’s unclear, untested, or untrusted. For example, I worked with a CEO rolling out a sweeping technology overhaul. His first instinct when his managers hesitated was frustration—until we sat down and dissected the resistance. It turned out the managers weren’t doubting the technology; they were worried about the gap between the training timeline and the rollout date. They didn’t fear change—they feared being set up to fail.  When you stop labeling resistance as “non-compliance” and start treating it like intelligence gathering, you find it points to the very levers you can pull to move the change forward.
How
By Rich Hagberg August 1, 2025
Most startup founders are brilliant at innovation, disruption, and blazing new trails. They're visionaries, incredibly driven, and fiercely independent. Unfortunately, those same powerful traits often sabotage their ability to foster genuine collaboration—a critical ingredient in startup success. I've spent decades coaching founders, and one of the biggest blind spots I've observed is the gap between what founders naturally do well and what's required to create truly collaborative cultures. Understanding these tendencies—and knowing how to counter them—can mean the difference between startup stagnation and breakout growth. High Independence, Low Collaboration Founders thrive on independence. They love breaking rules, ignoring boundaries, and pushing limits. But independence can quickly morph into isolation. The very idea of slowing down to seek consensus or accommodate team input feels restrictive, even suffocating. Implications: This independent streak inadvertently sidelines team members, suppresses input, and reduces engagement. Talented people quickly learn their ideas don't matter, and teams become passive or defensive. Actions to Counter: Practice deliberately inclusive decision-making. Clearly define which decisions you'll make alone and where you'll solicit team input. Regularly check in to see if team members feel heard and involved. Dominance Isn’t Always Dominant Many founders naturally take a commanding stance. Their assertiveness, directness, and forcefulness can spark initial progress but, over time, it creates resistance. When team members feel steamrolled or fearful of speaking up, creativity vanishes. Implications: A dominant style shuts down communication, makes feedback difficult, and kills the very collaboration needed for sustained innovation. Actions to Counter: Make intentional space for quieter team members to speak. Foster psychological safety by modeling vulnerability and humility Balance assertiveness with curiosity—actively seek feedback rather than waiting for it. The Curse of Poor Delegation Delegation isn't just handing off tasks—it's handing off trust. But founders notoriously struggle with this, often believing only they can execute properly. Every task not delegated reinforces the message that the team isn’t capable. Implications: Poor delegation creates bottlenecks, slows execution, and demoralizes talented employees who feel undervalued and micromanaged. Actions to Counter: Start small by delegating lower-risk tasks clearly and thoroughly. Regularly check your impulses to micromanage; remind yourself why you hired capable people. Invest in mentoring and coaching rather than controlling. Communication Breakdown Founders are famously impatient. They think fast, act fast, and often communicate quickly or incompletely. What seems obvious to them might be totally unclear to their team. Implications: Poor communication creates ambiguity, confusion, and frustration, grinding collaboration to a halt. Teams waste energy guessing expectations rather than innovating. Actions to Counter: Slow down to clearly articulate the "why" behind your decisions. Confirm understanding by asking team members to reflect back their interpretations. Regularly solicit feedback on your communication style and clarity. Arrogance: The Silent Collaboration Killer Confidence is crucial. But confidence unchecked can veer into arrogance, leading founders to dismiss feedback, overlook critical insights, and alienate key contributors. Implications: Arrogance destroys trust, stifles dialogue, and creates a toxic environment where collaboration is impossible. Actions to Counter: Intentionally invite critique and respond openly and constructively. Regularly acknowledge your mistakes publicly to model humility. Actively seek alternative viewpoints before finalizing decisions. Conflict Avoidance (or Aggression) Many founders fall into two extreme camps: conflict avoiders or conflict initiators. Both extremes are deadly to collaboration. Avoiding conflict leaves critical issues unresolved. Aggressive conflict handling creates resentment and fear. Implications: Poorly managed conflict erodes team cohesion, undermines trust, and can spiral into prolonged dysfunction. Actions to Counter: Establish clear, structured conflict resolution processes. Practice direct yet respectful conflict conversations. Use neutral facilitation for emotionally charged discussions. Systems Thinking vs. Reactive Planning Startups prize agility and adaptability. But too much short-term thinking neglects the processes and structures that sustain collaboration. Without clear systems, teams fall into chaos. Implications: Reactive planning leads to burnout, inefficiency, and frustration as team members constantly fight fires rather than building strategically. Actions to Counter: Balance short-term agility with consistent investment in systems and clear processes. Regularly revisit and improve structures as your company scales. Empower process-oriented thinkers in your organization to build effective systems. Workaholism and Burnout Culture Founders set the pace. But when founders turn workaholic, they unknowingly create an environment of exhaustion, anxiety, and diminished psychological safety. Exhausted teams are seldom collaborative. Implications: Productivity drops, innovation dries up, and talented employees start to leave. Actions to Counter: Actively model sustainable work-life balance. Publicly recognize and reward collaborative, balanced behaviors. Regularly monitor signs of burnout and intervene early. Ambiguity Isn’t Always Your Friend Founders typically tolerate ambiguity better than most. But your team needs clarity and direction. Too much ambiguity creates stress and undermines collaborative execution. Implications: Team paralysis, lack of initiative, and increased frustration. Actions to Counter: Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Regularly ask your team what clarity they need to be effective. Balance your tolerance for ambiguity with your team’s genuine need for guidance. The Collaboration Paradox Founders face a paradox. The same traits that fuel their success—independence, assertiveness, rapid execution—also sabotage the collaborative environments crucial for scaling. Acknowledging this paradox is the first step. The second is intentionally adopting behaviors that might feel unnatural at first: fostering inclusive communication, delegating with trust, managing conflict constructively, investing in systems thinking, and balancing your independent streak with genuine empathy.  The good news? These skills are learnable. Great founders don’t have to become entirely different people; they simply need to expand their toolkit. Start today by picking just one area and committing to small, consistent improvements. Your team and your startup—will thank you.
The Recognition Paradox: 
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
By Rich Hagberg July 31, 2025
The Recognition Paradox: Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
ALL ARTICLES