Article

The Alchemy of a Founder: Their Unique Blend of Traits Makes Them Startup Leaders

November 18, 2024
Alchemy of a Founder image

If you’ve ever met a founder—or better yet, spent time trying to understand what drives them—you’ll notice something right away: they’re wired differently. Founders think, act, and lead in ways that set them apart from the rest of us. They’re creative, fiercely independent, adaptable, and never afraid to challenge the status quo. These aren’t just personality quirks; they’re the traits that make founders uniquely suited to lead startups through the chaos and uncertainty of building something new.


Over the years, I’ve worked with and studied 122 founders. Through personality assessments, interviews, and 360-degree reviews, I’ve uncovered patterns that explain what makes these individuals tick. What I’ve learned is that their success isn’t just about being good at one thing—it’s about how a constellation of traits comes together to create something extraordinary.


Let’s explore what makes founders so different, and why their unique blend of traits is perfectly suited to turning bold ideas into reality.


1. Creativity: The Spark That Lights the Fire

Founders are, above all else, creators. Their creativity isn’t limited to brainstorming product ideas or designing clever logos—it runs much deeper. It’s about how they see the world and solve problems. Founders are experts at divergent thinking, which is the ability to generate multiple solutions to a problem. Unlike most people, who might look for the “right” answer, founders explore every possibility, often discovering connections that others miss.


One founder I worked with described his process as “building a puzzle with pieces no one else knows exist.” He didn’t just see gaps in the market—he saw opportunities to redefine the rules entirely. This is how founders come up with ideas that feel inevitable in hindsight but revolutionary in the moment. Think of how Airbnb reimagined travel or how a small fintech founder rethought home mortgages by asking, “Why does this process still feel like it’s stuck in the 1980s?”


This creativity doesn’t just happen in isolation. Founders draw inspiration from everywhere—other industries, conversations with customers, even random insights while taking a walk. They’re constantly feeding their minds, which is why their ideas often seem larger-than-life.


But creativity can also be a curse. Many founders struggle with what I call “idea overload.” They generate so many concepts that it’s hard for their teams to keep up. One founder I studied was described by his team as an “idea machine who never turns off.” While this made him a visionary, it also led to frustration when priorities shifted too frequently. The best founders learn to harness their creativity by building systems that help them filter and focus their ideas.


2. External Focus: Tuning into the World Around Them

Founders are often hyper-aware of what’s happening outside their companies. They’re not just focused on their own products or teams—they’re scanning the horizon for trends, customer feedback, competitor moves, and industry shifts. This external focus is one of their most powerful tools, helping them spot opportunities and adapt before it’s too late.

In my research, I found that many successful founders make a habit of gathering insights directly from the world around them. One founder regularly sat in cafes and struck up conversations with potential customers, asking about their frustrations and dreams. Another spent many hours reading obscure industry reports, looking for trends others hadn’t noticed yet. These habits helped them stay ahead of the curve, turning raw observations into actionable insights.


This outward-facing mindset also makes founders excellent at connecting the dots between seemingly unrelated things. One founder noticed that social media influencers were starting to dominate consumer attention and thought, “What if we built a product that turned influencers into brand ambassadors?” That insight led to a company now worth hundreds of millions of dollars.


But there’s a downside to being so externally focused. Founders can sometimes get distracted by shiny trends or conflicting advice. The key is knowing what to filter out and what to act on. The best founders use their external focus not as a distraction, but as a compass, helping them steer their companies in the right direction.


3. Adaptability: Rolling with the Punches

Starting a company is messy. Plans fail, markets shift, competitors emerge, and funding dries up. What separates founders who thrive from those who flounder is their adaptability—their ability to pivot, experiment, and learn from failure.


One founder in my research showed this adaptability in action during the early days of the pandemic. His business, which relied on in-person events, saw revenue plummet overnight. Instead of panicking, he quickly pivoted to virtual events, redesigning his entire business model in a matter of weeks. That ability to embrace change saved the company and even opened up new opportunities he hadn’t considered before.


This kind of flexibility doesn’t come naturally to everyone, but it’s second nature to most founders. They’re comfortable with ambiguity and uncertainty, and they see every challenge as an opportunity to iterate and improve. In psychology, this mindset is often linked to a trait called “tolerance for ambiguity,” which describes how well someone can function in uncertain or unpredictable environments.


However, adaptability has its limits. Founders who change course too often risk creating confusion and instability. One founder I studied was so quick to pivot that his team joked they should call him “Captain Whiplash.” The lesson here? Adaptability is a superpower, but it needs to be paired with focus and consistency to be effective.


4. Challenging the Status Quo: Rebels with a Vision

Founders don’t just accept the world as it is—they challenge it. They see rules, norms, and conventions as opportunities to innovate. This rebellious streak is often what pushes them to start companies in the first place.


One founder in my research built her business around a simple question: “Why hasn’t this been done differently?” She wasn’t content to accept the inefficiencies and frustrations of her industry. Instead, she set out to create something better, rallying her team and customers around a vision of what could be.


This ability to challenge the status quo isn’t just about being contrarian. It’s about seeing possibilities that others can’t—or won’t—imagine. Founders don’t break rules for the sake of it; they do it because they believe there’s a better way.


But being a rebel isn’t always easy. Founders who constantly push for change can sometimes overwhelm their teams or struggle to gain buy-in. The best leaders know how to channel their disruptive energy in ways that inspire, rather than alienate, those around them.


5. Independence and Nonconformity: Marching to Their Own Beat

If there’s one thing most founders have in common, it’s their fierce independence. They’re not the type to wait for permission or follow someone else’s playbook. Instead, they carve their own paths, often defying expectations along the way.


This independence is closely tied to their nonconformity. Founders aren’t afraid to stand out, think differently, or challenge authority. They bristle at bureaucracy and reject anything that feels too rigid or confining. For them, starting a company isn’t just about building a business—it’s about creating a world where they can thrive on their own terms.


This independent streak can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it gives founders the courage to take risks and pursue bold ideas. On the other hand, it can make them difficult to work with. One founder I studied was so resistant to collaboration that his team described him as “a lone wolf who refuses to run with the pack.” Over time, he learned to balance his independence with a willingness to listen and delegate, transforming his leadership style in the process.


6. The Alchemy of Traits: Where the Magic Happens

What makes founders truly extraordinary isn’t any one trait—it’s the combination. Their creativity drives their vision. Their external focus keeps them grounded in reality. Their adaptability helps them navigate challenges, and their willingness to challenge the status quo pushes them to innovate. Independence gives them the grit to pursue their ideas, even in the face of doubt.


But here’s the real magic: these traits don’t exist in isolation. They interact in complex ways, creating a leadership style perfectly suited for the chaos and uncertainty of startups. For example, a founder’s creativity might fuel their adaptability, helping them come up with new solutions when things go wrong. Their independence might complement their rebellious streak, giving them the confidence to challenge norms and take bold risks.



The result is a leader who isn’t just capable of starting a company, but of leading it through the ups and downs of growth, competition, and change.


A Few Final Thoughts

The founders I’ve studied are far from perfect. Their traits can sometimes cause friction, and their leadership styles aren’t always easy to work with. But it’s precisely their quirks, contradictions, and complexities that make them who they are. They’re dreamers, doers, and disruptors. And in a world that often rewards conformity, they remind us of the power of thinking differently.


So, if you’re an aspiring founder—or just someone looking to lead with more creativity and boldness—embrace your unique blend of traits. Lean into your creativity. Stay tuned to the world around you. Adapt when you need to. Challenge assumptions. And most importantly, don’t be afraid to march to your own beat. After all, the best ideas often come from the people who refuse to fit the mold.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

The Hidden Cost of Care: When Empathy Becomes a Leadership Liability (Part 5 of The Best Leaders Pla
By Rich Hagberg November 28, 2025
The Nicest Boss in the World He was adored. He remembered birthdays, checked in on people’s families, and stayed late helping fix slides no one asked him to touch. His team called him “the best boss we’ve ever had.” He was also running on fumes. Behind the warm smile was a leader quietly burning out — drowning in everyone else’s problems, too empathetic for his own good. If you’re a leader who prides yourself on caring deeply, this might sting a little: empathy, taken too far, becomes control in disguise. Empathy’s Secret Shadow Empathy is essential for leadership. It builds loyalty, safety, and trust. But the same trait that makes people feel seen can also make them dependent. When you can’t tolerate someone else’s discomfort, you start protecting them from it. You step in to fix, to soothe, to rescue. It looks noble. It feels generous. But it quietly steals agency — theirs and yours. Your team stops growing because you’re doing their emotional labor. You stop leading because you’re managing feelings instead of outcomes. That’s the hidden cost of care. The Emotional Guilt Loop Over-empathetic leaders live in a constant tug-of-war between compassion and guilt. They think: “They’re already stretched — I can’t pile more on.” “If I push harder, I’ll seem uncaring.” “I’ll just do it myself; it’s easier.” Sound familiar? That’s not empathy anymore. That’s guilt masquerading as kindness. And guilt makes terrible business decisions. Because guilt doesn’t guide you toward what’s right. It just steers you away from what feels uncomfortable. A Founder’s Story One founder I coached, let’s call her Lina, led with heart. She built her company around “people first.” And she meant it. But somewhere along the way, “people first” turned into “me last.” She couldn’t say no. She kept saving underperformers, approving vacations during crunch time, rewriting others’ work to spare them stress. Her team adored her — until they didn’t. Because beneath her helpfulness was quiet resentment. And resentment always leaks. The breakthrough came when she realized something simple but hard: “I was protecting people from learning the hard parts of growth.” That’s when she started leading again instead of parenting. When Caring Becomes Control Here’s the paradox: the more you care, the more you risk over-controlling. You jump in to fix not because you don’t trust them, but because you feel for them. It’s empathy turned inward — I can’t stand watching them struggle. But leadership isn’t about eliminating discomfort. It’s about using it wisely. People grow by stretching, not by being spared. When you save someone from every failure, you’re also saving them from competence. The Biology of Burnout Chronic empathy triggers chronic stress. When you absorb other people’s emotions all day, your nervous system never gets a break. You start mirroring everyone’s anxiety like an emotional amplifier. Your brain thinks you’re in crisis — even when you’re not. That’s why over-caring leaders are often the first to burn out. Their compassion becomes constant cortisol. The irony? The leaders who want to create safety for others end up unsafe themselves. How to Care Without Carrying Feel, then filter. It’s okay to feel someone’s frustration. Just don’t keep it. Ask: “Is this mine to hold?” Help through accountability. Say, “I know this is tough, and I also need you to take ownership.” The and matters. Let discomfort be developmental. When a team member struggles, resist rescuing. Stay present, not protective. Coach before you comfort. Instead of “Don’t worry,” try, “What do you think your next move is?” Reframe empathy as empowerment. Caring isn’t about absorbing pain; it’s about believing people can handle it. Funny but True One exec I worked with told me, “Every time I stop helping, I feel like a jerk.” I said, “No — you feel like a leader. It just takes a while to tell the difference.” He laughed and said, “So… you’re telling me leadership feels bad at first?” I said, “Exactly. Growth always does.” The Cultural Ripple Effect When leaders overfunction, teams underfunction. When leaders hold space instead of taking space, teams rise. Empathy should expand others, not consume you. The healthiest cultures balance care and candor — support and stretch. They normalize struggle as part of the process instead of something to be hidden or rescued. That’s what real compassion looks like in motion. The Maturity of Tough Empathy Empathy without boundaries is exhaustion. Empathy with boundaries is wisdom. The mature version of empathy doesn’t say, “I’ll protect you.” It says, “I believe you can handle this — and I’ll walk beside you while you do.” That’s not cold. That’s developmental. Your Challenge This Week Notice where you’re rescuing someone instead of coaching them. Pause before you step in. Ask yourself, Am I helping because they need it — or because I need to feel helpful? Then take one small risk: let them handle it. They’ll probably surprise you. And you’ll feel lighter than you have in months. Final Word Caring is beautiful. It’s what makes you human. But unchecked empathy turns leaders into emotional pack mules — carrying what was never theirs to bear. Real leadership is still full of heart. It just remembers that compassion without accountability isn’t love. It’s fear.  And the moment you stop rescuing everyone, you finally start freeing them — and yourself.
Leading Without Fear: The Psychological Maturity Behind Sound Judgment (Part 4 of The Best Leaders P
By Rich Hagberg November 28, 2025
The Smart Leader’s Blind Spot It’s strange how often the smartest people make the worst decisions under pressure. They don’t lose IQ. They lose perspective. I’ve seen this happen more times than I can count. A sharp, decisive executive starts second-guessing every move. They overanalyze, overwork, and overcontrol — all in the name of being “thorough.” They think they’re being rational. But underneath the spreadsheets and meetings is something far less logical. It’s fear. The Fear That Doesn’t Look Like Fear We think of fear as panic — sweating, shaking, obvious. But most leadership fear hides behind competence. It shows up as perfectionism, busyness, overcommitment, indecision. It sounds like, “Let’s get more data.” “Let’s not rush this.” “Let’s keep this one close.” That’s not analysis. That’s avoidance with a better vocabulary. When fear runs the show, the goal subtly shifts from making the right decision to avoiding the wrong one. And those two things are worlds apart. The Cost of Fear-Based Leadership When leaders operate from fear, everything tightens. They stop listening. They rush to defend. They play small when the company needs boldness. They keep people who are loyal over people who are competent — because loyalty feels safer. And here’s the real tragedy: the team starts copying the fear. They become cautious, compliant, quiet. Pretty soon, no one’s leading anymore. They’re all managing risk — mostly emotional risk. A CEO’s Moment of Truth One CEO I coached — brilliant, confident, deeply human — was terrified of being wrong in front of his board. He masked it well. On the outside: decisive. Inside: a constant hum of anxiety. After a tough quarter, he admitted, “I realized half my decisions weren’t based on strategy — they were based on protecting my image.” That moment of honesty was the start of his maturity curve. Once he could name the fear, it stopped running his show. He didn’t become fearless. He became aware. And awareness is what turns reaction into wisdom. Why Fear Feels Safer Than Clarity Fear has a strange way of convincing us it’s caution. Caution whispers, “Slow down and look.” Fear screams, “Don’t move.” The first sharpens judgment. The second paralyzes it. And the more we listen to fear, the more it disguises itself as prudence. That’s why emotional maturity isn’t about suppressing fear. It’s about being able to say, “Ah, that’s fear talking — not fact.” How Fear Distorts the Mind Here’s what happens when fear hijacks leadership: Tunnel vision: You fixate on the immediate threat and forget the big picture. Confirmation bias: You start looking for data that validates your anxiety. Short-termism: You make safe decisions that feel good now and cause pain later. Blame shifting: You protect your ego by pushing ownership outward. The mind gets smaller. The leader gets reactive. The company gets stuck. The Maturity Shift Emotional maturity isn’t about being unshakable. It’s about staying curious in the presence of fear. Mature leaders don’t pretend they’re fearless. They just don’t let fear make the decisions. They pause, breathe, and ask, “What part of this is data, and what part is my insecurity talking?” That single question can change everything. A Founder’s Story A founder I worked with once said, “I’m not afraid — I just have high standards.” But as we unpacked it, he realized those “high standards” were actually a way to control outcomes. He feared disappointment — his own and others’. When he finally stopped trying to protect his reputation and started protecting his clarity, his decisions got faster and cleaner. The business didn’t just grow — it started breathing again. Because when you stop trying to look right, you finally have room to be right. Funny, But True I once asked a CEO what he’d do differently if he weren’t afraid of failing. He said, “Probably the same things I’m doing now — just with less Advil.” That’s the thing: most leaders already know what to do. Fear just makes it hurt more. How to Lead Without Fear (Even When It’s There) Name it early. The sooner you recognize fear, the less power it has. Ask yourself, “What’s the story fear’s telling me right now?” Reframe mistakes as tuition. You’ll still pay for errors — might as well learn something from them. Separate identity from outcome. A bad decision doesn’t mean a bad leader. It means a leader who’s still learning — like everyone else. Keep one truth-teller nearby. Someone who loves you enough to tell you when you’re acting from ego. Practice micro-bravery. Tell one hard truth a day. Say “I don’t know” once a week. Let discomfort become strength training. The Paradox of Fear Fear doesn’t make you weak. It means you care. But if you never face it, it becomes your compass — and it always points backward. Courage, maturity, clarity — they’re not opposites of fear. They’re what happen when you stop running from it. Your Challenge This Week Next time you feel that knot in your stomach — before a board meeting, a tough conversation, a high-stakes call — pause. Ask yourself: What am I afraid might happen? Then ask: What might happen if I act from clarity instead of fear? That’s not therapy. That’s leadership hygiene. Final Word The mark of maturity isn’t fearlessness. It’s self-awareness. You can’t control your fear. But you can choose whether it sits in the driver’s seat or the passenger’s.  Great leaders don’t wait for fear to disappear. They lead with it beside them — quietly, respectfully — but never in charge.
The Courage to Let Go: Delegation as the Ultimate Act of Trust (Part 2 of The Best Leaders Playbook
By Rich Hagberg November 21, 2025
The Overworked Hero Syndrome You can spot this one a mile away. They’re running at 120%, inbox exploding, calendar packed like a game of Tetris.  They tell themselves it’s noble — “The team’s counting on me.” But deep down, it’s addiction. I know this pattern because I’ve lived it. That little rush you get when someone says, “We couldn’t do this without you”? That’s the dopamine hit of leadership ego. Feels good. Until it doesn’t. Because being indispensable isn’t a compliment. It’s a warning. Why Smart People Struggle to Let Go Most leaders don’t hoard work because they’re bad at delegation. They hoard because delegation threatens their identity. If your sense of worth comes from being the fixer, the doer, the one who “always delivers,” letting go feels like erasure. Who are you if you’re not in every meeting? Who are you if things go fine without you? That’s the emotional root of overwork — not competence, but fear of irrelevance. Control in Disguise Delegation looks like an operational skill, but it’s really emotional work. Leaders tell me all the time: “I can’t delegate — my team’s not ready.” What they mean is: “I can’t delegate — I’m not ready.” The truth is, your people won’t become ready until you give them the chance. That’s the brutal math of leadership: you can have control, or you can have scale. You don’t get both. A Founder’s Story A founder I coached — let’s call her Sara — ran her company like a benevolent tornado. She did everything: strategy, hiring, investor calls, even reviewing design files “just to make sure the tone was right.” When she came to me, she was working 80-hour weeks and quietly resenting everyone she was “helping.” I asked, “What would happen if you stopped fixing things for people?” She said, “They’d drop the ball.” Six months later, she tested it. She handed off a project completely — no shadow-managing, no emergency check-ins. Her team nailed it. She said, “I didn’t realize they were this capable.” I said, “They didn’t realize you were this controlling.” We both laughed — but she got the point. The Real Meaning of Delegation Delegation isn’t a time-management trick. It’s a transfer of trust. It says, “I believe you can handle this — even if you don’t do it exactly my way.” It’s also a developmental gift. When you delegate fully, you don’t just lighten your load — you level someone up. Delegation is how leaders stop being the engine and start being the architect. The Fear Behind “It’s Easier If I Just Do It” That sentence might as well be carved on the tombstone of burned-out executives everywhere. Sure, doing it yourself feels faster. But every time you do, you quietly train the organization to need you. You build a culture of dependence — and then complain that people don’t take initiative. Delegation feels risky because it is. You will lose control of how something gets done. But you gain something far more valuable: time to lead, not just manage. Funny but True I once told a CEO, “If you died tomorrow, who could run your company?” He said, “That’s morbid.” I said, “No — that’s planning.” He got the message. A few months later, he’d built a real leadership team for the first time. He told me, “It’s weird — I’m working less, and everything’s better.” That’s not weird. That’s delegation done right. How to Build the Trust Muscle Start small, but mean it. Hand off one real decision — not a token task. Resist the urge to check back in “just to see how it’s going.” Define success, not the path. Set the destination clearly, then step back. They’ll probably surprise you with how differently — and often better — they get there. Coach after, not during. Let people own outcomes before you give feedback. Growth requires a little space to fail safely. Reward initiative, not imitation. If you only praise people for doing things your way, you’ll never build leaders — only clones. Say thank you — and mean it. Appreciation is the emotional contract that makes delegation sustainable. The Emotional Reframe Delegation isn’t about trust in others. It’s about trust in yourself — in the system you’ve built, in your ability to recover from other people’s mistakes, and in your willingness to be unnecessary. That last one’s the hardest. But when you finally stop trying to be irreplaceable, your company starts becoming unstoppable. Your Challenge This Week Write down everything on your plate. Circle three things that drain you but could teach someone else something valuable. Pick one and delegate it — completely. Then, when the urge to “check in” hits, take a walk instead. Let them own it. When it works — and it will — tell them. Celebrate it. Because that’s how trust compounds. Final Word Letting go doesn’t make you weaker. It proves you’re strong enough to lead without needing to control. Every founder eventually faces the same test: can you stop being the engine and start being the ecosystem? The day you say yes, you stop leading through force and start leading through faith. That’s not surrender. That’s courage.
ALL ARTICLES