Article

When Their Moral Compass Fails, Leaders Fail: How Greed, Power, and Pressure Can Destroy Founders

January 3, 2025

Success in entrepreneurship is a double-edged sword. On one side lies the glory of innovation, wealth, and influence. On the other, an abyss where unchecked ambition, greed, and power pull founders into destructive cycles. Over 40 years of coaching startup founders and executives, I’ve seen both ends of this spectrum. Some founders achieve extraordinary success by balancing ambition with integrity, while others, often blinded by their own brilliance, derail their companies and their lives.


The sad truth? Many of these failures are not inevitable; they are self-inflicted. Founders sabotage themselves by succumbing to the very traits that once made them great. These traps are amplified by the relentless pressure to perform, demands from investors, and their own inner cravings for power and recognition.


The Curse of Ambition


Ambition is a founder’s lifeblood. It drives the late nights, the impossible pitches, and the daring decisions that turn ideas into empires. But unchecked ambition? That’s a different beast. It’s the kind that convinces founders the rules don’t apply to them.


Take Elizabeth Holmes, the once-celebrated CEO of Theranos. Her ambition to revolutionize healthcare was undeniable, but it morphed into something darker. Manipulation and deceit became her tools of choice to achieve what she couldn’t deliver. Investors, employees, and even patients paid the price for her Machiavellian tendencies. And she isn’t alone. I’ve seen countless founders convince themselves that ends justify the means. The result? Burnt bridges and broken companies.


In my coaching work, I’ve encountered founders who push their teams and themselves beyond healthy limits, all in the name of ambition. They prioritize winning over relationships, cutting corners and burning out the very people who could have helped them succeed. Ambition is not inherently bad, but it becomes a curse when it blinds you to the ethical and human costs of your decisions.


If you’re a founder, ask yourself: Has your ambition blinded you? Have you started seeing people as tools to be used rather than partners in your journey? Ambition without integrity is a ticking time bomb. Don’t wait for it to explode.


The Pressure Cooker of Success


Pressure is inevitable in a founder’s life. Investors demand results, employees expect leadership, and the market moves at breakneck speed. This pressure is not just external—it’s internal too. Founders are often their harshest critics. But here’s the catch: pressure reveals character. It can either sharpen you or break you.


Trevor Milton, founder of Nikola, is a case in point. The pressure to deliver on his promises to investors led him to embellish—no, outright fabricate—the capabilities of Nikola’s technology. The market was initially dazzled, but when the truth emerged, it wasn’t just Milton’s reputation that crumbled. Investors lost millions, and the company’s credibility was shattered.


Pressure can also distort priorities. Founders often start out with noble intentions, driven by a vision to make the world better. But as the stakes rise, so does the temptation to compromise. This might mean prioritizing investor demands over employee well-being or cutting ethical corners to hit a quarterly target. In my experience, the founders who fail under pressure often lack a clear set of values to guide their decisions.


I’ve seen founders crumble under similar pressure. They start cutting corners, making promises they can’t keep, and blaming others for their failures. Pressure is a test. Are you prepared to pass it, or will you let it strip away your integrity?


Blinded by Cognitive Bias


Let me be blunt: your brain is lying to you. Cognitive biases are sneaky saboteurs, distorting your perception and decision-making. Confirmation bias, for instance, makes you seek out information that supports your beliefs while ignoring evidence that contradicts them. Sound familiar?


Elizabeth Holmes also fell victim to this when she ignored repeated warnings from scientists and engineers that her technology didn’t work. She was so invested in her vision that she dismissed anything that challenged it. Elon Musk’s infamous tweet about taking Tesla private at $420 per share is another example of overconfidence, a bias that can turn brilliance into recklessness.


Another common bias is moral disengagement—the ability to rationalize unethical behavior. Martin Shkreli’s price-gouging of life-saving drugs is a textbook case. He justified his actions as “good business,” completely disregarding the human cost.


Founders, your vision is your greatest strength, but it’s also your greatest vulnerability. Surround yourself with people who challenge you. Seek out data that disproves your assumptions. If you’re not willing to question yourself, your company’s fate is already sealed.


The Seduction of Power


Power changes people. It’s a psychological fact. The more power you have, the less empathy you feel. You begin to see yourself as invincible, above the rules. Billy McFarland, the mastermind behind Fyre Festival, exemplifies this perfectly. His unchecked power allowed him to defraud investors and sell a fantasy that was doomed from the start. The result? Jail time and a cultural punchline that no founder wants to be.


Power also creates blind spots. Founders who centralize authority often miss out on crucial feedback and alternative perspectives. Adam Neumann of WeWork built a company that revolved around his vision but failed to create the checks and balances needed for sustainable growth. When his excesses caught up with him, the fallout was catastrophic.


As a founder, it’s tempting to centralize power. After all, it’s your vision, your company, your baby. But power without accountability is poison. Build systems that hold you accountable. Empower your team to challenge you. And never, ever believe your own hype.


Greed: The Original Sin


Greed isn’t just about money. It’s about the insatiable desire for more—more recognition, more control, more validation. I’ve seen founders destroy their companies because their greed blinded them to the bigger picture. Martin Shkreli’s price gouging of life-saving drugs is a textbook example. His pursuit of profit at all costs made him a pariah and landed him in prison.


Greed can manifest in subtle ways too. Maybe it’s pushing employees harder than they can handle to meet unrealistic goals. Maybe it’s ignoring ethical concerns to secure a lucrative deal. Whatever form it takes, greed erodes trust, both within your company and with the outside world.


Founders, ask yourself: What’s driving you? Is it a desire to build something meaningful, or is it greed masquerading as ambition? Be honest, because greed will never be satisfied, and it will take you down with it.


The Culture You Create


Founders set the tone for their companies. If you’re cutting corners, turning a blind eye to unethical practices, or prioritizing results over integrity, don’t be surprised when your team follows suit. Wells Fargo’s fake account scandal is a stark reminder of how toxic cultures start at the top.


In my work, I’ve seen founders who foster cultures of fear, secrecy, and favoritism. These cultures breed resentment and disengagement, making it nearly impossible to build a sustainable business. Your culture is your legacy. Make sure it’s one you can be proud of.


Creating a healthy culture requires more than platitudes. It demands transparency, fairness, and accountability. Employees need to see that ethical behavior is rewarded and that unethical actions have consequences. Without this, your culture becomes a breeding ground for dysfunction.


The Redemption of Self-Awareness


Here’s the good news: these traps are avoidable. The antidote is self-awareness. Great founders know their strengths and weaknesses. They recognize when they’re veering off course and take steps to correct it.


One founder I coached—let’s call him Jake—was a textbook case of overconfidence. His company was growing rapidly, but his micromanagement and refusal to delegate were stifling his team. When Jake finally admitted he couldn’t do it all, he brought in a COO who complemented his skill set. The company thrived.


Self-awareness isn’t just about admitting your flaws. It’s about building systems and relationships that keep you grounded. Surround yourself with people who challenge you, not yes-men who validate your worst instincts. And never stop reflecting on why you started this journey in the first place.


Conclusion


Entrepreneurship is one of the most challenging and rewarding paths you can take. But it’s also a minefield of traps that can destroy everything you’ve worked for. Greed, power, and pressure are constant companions on this journey, and how you handle them will define your legacy.


The question isn’t whether you’ll face these challenges—you will. The question is whether you’ll let them control you. Will you fall into the traps that have derailed so many founders before you, or will you rise above them?

The choice is yours. But remember success without integrity is failure by another name.


Lead wisely.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

e
By Rich Hagberg August 9, 2025
Introduction: The Brutal Truth About Change If you’re leading a company, here’s one brutal truth you can’t dodge: resistance to change isn’t just inevitable—it’s a gift. Most leaders don’t see it that way. They treat it like an obstacle to bulldoze, something to out-argue, out-maneuver, or silence. But resistance, if you know how to read it, is a living, breathing diagnostic tool. Every objection, every sideways comment in a hallway, every moment of awkward silence in a meeting—it’s all data. It tells you where the trust gaps are, where the communication breakdowns have happened, and where your people’s unspoken fears live. If you ignore that data, you’re flying blind. The hard numbers back this up: more than 70% of organizational change initiatives fail, not because the strategy was flawed, but because leaders underestimated what it would take to guide people through the emotional turbulence of transformation. If you want your next big initiative to succeed, the shift starts here: stop seeing resistance as the enemy, and start listening to what it’s telling you. When you do, you’ll discover that resistance isn’t a wall to break down—it’s a map showing you exactly where to go next. 1. Rethink Resistance: It’s Data, Not Defiance Let’s flip the lens. When people resist, they’re rarely doing it for sport. They’re sending up flares. They’re telling you something’s unclear, untested, or untrusted. For example, I worked with a CEO rolling out a sweeping technology overhaul. His first instinct when his managers hesitated was frustration—until we sat down and dissected the resistance. It turned out the managers weren’t doubting the technology; they were worried about the gap between the training timeline and the rollout date. They didn’t fear change—they feared being set up to fail.  When you stop labeling resistance as “non-compliance” and start treating it like intelligence gathering, you find it points to the very levers you can pull to move the change forward.
How
By Rich Hagberg August 1, 2025
Most startup founders are brilliant at innovation, disruption, and blazing new trails. They're visionaries, incredibly driven, and fiercely independent. Unfortunately, those same powerful traits often sabotage their ability to foster genuine collaboration—a critical ingredient in startup success. I've spent decades coaching founders, and one of the biggest blind spots I've observed is the gap between what founders naturally do well and what's required to create truly collaborative cultures. Understanding these tendencies—and knowing how to counter them—can mean the difference between startup stagnation and breakout growth. High Independence, Low Collaboration Founders thrive on independence. They love breaking rules, ignoring boundaries, and pushing limits. But independence can quickly morph into isolation. The very idea of slowing down to seek consensus or accommodate team input feels restrictive, even suffocating. Implications: This independent streak inadvertently sidelines team members, suppresses input, and reduces engagement. Talented people quickly learn their ideas don't matter, and teams become passive or defensive. Actions to Counter: Practice deliberately inclusive decision-making. Clearly define which decisions you'll make alone and where you'll solicit team input. Regularly check in to see if team members feel heard and involved. Dominance Isn’t Always Dominant Many founders naturally take a commanding stance. Their assertiveness, directness, and forcefulness can spark initial progress but, over time, it creates resistance. When team members feel steamrolled or fearful of speaking up, creativity vanishes. Implications: A dominant style shuts down communication, makes feedback difficult, and kills the very collaboration needed for sustained innovation. Actions to Counter: Make intentional space for quieter team members to speak. Foster psychological safety by modeling vulnerability and humility Balance assertiveness with curiosity—actively seek feedback rather than waiting for it. The Curse of Poor Delegation Delegation isn't just handing off tasks—it's handing off trust. But founders notoriously struggle with this, often believing only they can execute properly. Every task not delegated reinforces the message that the team isn’t capable. Implications: Poor delegation creates bottlenecks, slows execution, and demoralizes talented employees who feel undervalued and micromanaged. Actions to Counter: Start small by delegating lower-risk tasks clearly and thoroughly. Regularly check your impulses to micromanage; remind yourself why you hired capable people. Invest in mentoring and coaching rather than controlling. Communication Breakdown Founders are famously impatient. They think fast, act fast, and often communicate quickly or incompletely. What seems obvious to them might be totally unclear to their team. Implications: Poor communication creates ambiguity, confusion, and frustration, grinding collaboration to a halt. Teams waste energy guessing expectations rather than innovating. Actions to Counter: Slow down to clearly articulate the "why" behind your decisions. Confirm understanding by asking team members to reflect back their interpretations. Regularly solicit feedback on your communication style and clarity. Arrogance: The Silent Collaboration Killer Confidence is crucial. But confidence unchecked can veer into arrogance, leading founders to dismiss feedback, overlook critical insights, and alienate key contributors. Implications: Arrogance destroys trust, stifles dialogue, and creates a toxic environment where collaboration is impossible. Actions to Counter: Intentionally invite critique and respond openly and constructively. Regularly acknowledge your mistakes publicly to model humility. Actively seek alternative viewpoints before finalizing decisions. Conflict Avoidance (or Aggression) Many founders fall into two extreme camps: conflict avoiders or conflict initiators. Both extremes are deadly to collaboration. Avoiding conflict leaves critical issues unresolved. Aggressive conflict handling creates resentment and fear. Implications: Poorly managed conflict erodes team cohesion, undermines trust, and can spiral into prolonged dysfunction. Actions to Counter: Establish clear, structured conflict resolution processes. Practice direct yet respectful conflict conversations. Use neutral facilitation for emotionally charged discussions. Systems Thinking vs. Reactive Planning Startups prize agility and adaptability. But too much short-term thinking neglects the processes and structures that sustain collaboration. Without clear systems, teams fall into chaos. Implications: Reactive planning leads to burnout, inefficiency, and frustration as team members constantly fight fires rather than building strategically. Actions to Counter: Balance short-term agility with consistent investment in systems and clear processes. Regularly revisit and improve structures as your company scales. Empower process-oriented thinkers in your organization to build effective systems. Workaholism and Burnout Culture Founders set the pace. But when founders turn workaholic, they unknowingly create an environment of exhaustion, anxiety, and diminished psychological safety. Exhausted teams are seldom collaborative. Implications: Productivity drops, innovation dries up, and talented employees start to leave. Actions to Counter: Actively model sustainable work-life balance. Publicly recognize and reward collaborative, balanced behaviors. Regularly monitor signs of burnout and intervene early. Ambiguity Isn’t Always Your Friend Founders typically tolerate ambiguity better than most. But your team needs clarity and direction. Too much ambiguity creates stress and undermines collaborative execution. Implications: Team paralysis, lack of initiative, and increased frustration. Actions to Counter: Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Regularly ask your team what clarity they need to be effective. Balance your tolerance for ambiguity with your team’s genuine need for guidance. The Collaboration Paradox Founders face a paradox. The same traits that fuel their success—independence, assertiveness, rapid execution—also sabotage the collaborative environments crucial for scaling. Acknowledging this paradox is the first step. The second is intentionally adopting behaviors that might feel unnatural at first: fostering inclusive communication, delegating with trust, managing conflict constructively, investing in systems thinking, and balancing your independent streak with genuine empathy.  The good news? These skills are learnable. Great founders don’t have to become entirely different people; they simply need to expand their toolkit. Start today by picking just one area and committing to small, consistent improvements. Your team and your startup—will thank you.
The Recognition Paradox: 
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
By Rich Hagberg July 31, 2025
The Recognition Paradox: Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
ALL ARTICLES