Article
Are You Leading Assertively, or Just Commanding Compliance?
December 12, 2024
Leadership is not about having all the answers, nor is it about being the loudest voice in the room. Yet, many leaders confuse authority with aggression, mistaking dominance for effectiveness. But let me ask you this: If you weren’t in charge—if your title were stripped away—would people still choose to follow you?
That’s the real test of leadership. It’s not about how many people obey your orders; it’s about how many are inspired to join you in pursuit of a shared vision. Assertiveness—when done right—creates that inspiration. It’s not forceful. It’s not loud. It’s clear, confident, and deeply rooted in respect for others.
Aggression may yield short-term results, but assertiveness builds something far more powerful: trust. So, the question isn’t just whether you’re leading; it’s how. The following blogpost summarizes what our sample of over 200 “Best Leaders” do differently.
All of our conclusions come from our proprietary research and highlights why assertiveness of one of the most important characteristics of outstanding leaders. This comes from the data folks!
1. Assertiveness Starts with Respectful Directness
The best leaders are clear about their expectations, but they’re just as clear about their respect for the people they lead. They don’t shy away from tough conversations, but they approach them with intention. Their words focus on the issue, not the person. They’re not just communicating—they’re connecting.
- Clarity Without Hostility: Consider this: A leader calmly says, “This project is falling behind schedule—what do you need to get back on track?” Compare that to someone snapping, “Why isn’t this done yet?” One creates alignment; the other creates anxiety. A team member once shared about their leader, “They never leave anyone guessing, but they never make you feel small.” That’s the kind of clarity that inspires trust.
- Respect for Boundaries: Assertive leaders respect the people around them. I’ve seen leaders start conversations with, “How’s your workload? Can we discuss balancing this priority with your other responsibilities?” Feedback often highlights leaders who “make requests in a way that respects others’ boundaries and capacities,” which builds mutual respect.
- Proactive, Not Reactive: Leaders who practice assertiveness address problems before they escalate. I worked with one executive who often said, “Let’s address this issue now so it doesn’t become a bigger challenge later.” Their team appreciated this proactive approach, saying, “They’re always upfront, but never in a way that makes you feel blamed.”
Key Takeaway: Respectful directness means balancing clear communication with respect. It’s not about sugarcoating or avoiding tough conversations; it’s about ensuring clarity while preserving trust and dignity. The result? Stronger connections and higher accountability.
2. Assertiveness Invites Feedback and Dialogue
The strongest leaders aren’t the ones with all the answers—they’re the ones who ask the best questions. Assertiveness isn’t about dominating the conversation; it’s about creating space for dialogue. It’s about being confident enough to listen, even when the feedback is uncomfortable.
- Active Listening: Assertive leaders don’t just listen to words; they listen for meaning. I’ve seen leaders paraphrase feedback like, “If I’m hearing you correctly, you’re saying we need to adjust the timeline to maintain quality. Let’s dig into that.” Team members praised this approach, saying, “They’re upfront but considerate of everyone’s perspectives.”
- Encourage Constructive Debate: Great leaders understand that disagreement is a sign of engagement, not rebellion. I’ve observed leaders say, “I love that you see it differently—how can we use your perspective to strengthen our approach?” Comments described them as “transparent and open to diverse ideas,” which fostered innovation and trust.
- Adapt Decision-Making: Assertive leaders are confident enough to change course when better ideas emerge. One leader I coached responded to their team’s suggestion by saying, “I hadn’t considered that—let’s pivot and incorporate it.” Feedback described them as “decisive yet flexible,” a hallmark of trust-building leadership.
Key Takeaway: Feedback and dialogue are not threats to assertiveness; they’re essential elements of it. Leaders who create space for collaboration and debate cultivate innovation and build trust through inclusion.
3. Consistency and Fairness Build Foundations of Trust
Leadership thrives on consistency. When people know what to expect from you—when your principles guide your actions—you create a foundation of trust. Assertiveness requires that your words and actions align every single time.
- Fair Application of Rules: Leaders who are assertive apply standards consistently while adapting to individual circumstances. I’ve seen executives explain, “We’re making adjustments for specific challenges, but the overall goals remain the same.” Teams described them as “fair and respectful, which builds trust across the board.”
- Transparency in Decision-Making: Assertiveness means being clear about the “why” behind decisions. During a restructuring, one leader told their team, “Here’s why this is necessary and how it aligns with our long-term goals.” The response? Respect and understanding. Employees appreciate leaders who “deliver tough news professionally and transparently.”
- Predictability in Behavior: Consistency is calming. I’ve observed leaders who address issues promptly and fairly, earning their teams’ loyalty. One team member said, “You always know where you stand with them—it’s refreshing and builds confidence.”
Key Takeaway: Fairness and consistency are the bedrock of assertiveness. Leaders who are predictable in their principles and actions foster loyalty and trust, creating stability in their teams.
4. Emotional Intelligence: The Unsung Hero of Assertiveness
Assertive leaders know that the way you say something is just as important as what you say. Emotional intelligence allows them to navigate sensitive issues with tact and empathy, ensuring their words land with impact—not injury.
- Reading the Room: Emotionally intelligent leaders observe body language and adjust accordingly. I saw one leader pause mid-discussion to address a quiet team member, saying, “You seem concerned—can we explore that?” Feedback highlighted leaders who “address issues respectfully without ignoring individual concerns.”
- Empathetic Framing: When delivering difficult feedback, assertive leaders balance honesty with care. They might say, “Your effort is clear, and I think we can take it even further by focusing on X.” Team members described such leaders as “assertive but never overbearing.”
- Tactful Responses: Leaders who respect their teams redirect conversations constructively. For example, one leader reframed a suggestion by saying, “That’s an interesting idea—let’s adapt it to fit our strategy.” Teams praised leaders who “separate people from issues and focus on solutions.”
Key Takeaway: Emotional intelligence transforms assertiveness into a tool for connection. By balancing honesty with empathy, leaders ensure their communication motivates rather than alienates.
5. Assertive Leaders Are Clear and Honest
Clarity is a gift. Assertive leaders ensure their teams always know where they stand and what’s expected. They eliminate guesswork, replacing it with straightforward communication and actionable feedback.
- Direct Feedback: Leaders who deliver specific, actionable feedback build confidence in their teams. One executive said, “Your data presentation was solid, but let’s make the visuals more engaging next time.” Teams described these leaders as “clear, direct, and respectful.”
- Transparent Expectations: Assertive leaders leave no room for ambiguity. They say things like, “Our goal is a 10% increase this quarter, and here’s how we’ll get there.” Feedback praised leaders who “provide straightforward guidance that eliminates confusion.”
- Admit Mistakes: Great leaders own their mistakes, modeling accountability. One leader told their team, “I should’ve handled this better—let’s adjust and move forward.” This humility earned their team’s trust and respect.
Key Takeaway: Honesty and clarity are non-negotiable for assertive leaders. By eliminating ambiguity and owning mistakes, they build credibility and foster a culture of accountability.
6. Confidence Without Arrogance Inspires Loyalty
True confidence is quiet, steady, and inclusive. Assertive leaders inspire loyalty because they lead with competence, not arrogance. They make decisions with conviction, but they never belittle or dismiss others.
- Firm, Yet Humble: Confident leaders assert their views while inviting input: “Here’s what I’m proposing—what’s your perspective?” Teams respect leaders who balance decisiveness with humility.
- Focus on Collaboration: Leaders who say, “We’ll achieve this together,” foster ownership and engagement. Feedback described them as “assertive but collaborative, which strengthens team dynamics.”
- Grace Under Pressure: In high-stress moments, assertive leaders remain calm and composed. One executive said, “We’ve faced bigger challenges before—we can handle this.” Their steady demeanor inspired confidence and focus within their team.
- Key Takeaway: Confidence becomes arrogance when it excludes others. Assertive leaders build loyalty by combining decisiveness with humility, ensuring everyone feels empowered to contribute.
The Big Question: Are You Inspiring or Intimidating?
Aggression may push people to act, but assertiveness inspires them to excel. When you lead with respect, clarity, and confidence, you create a culture of trust and collaboration—one where people don’t just work for you; they work with you.
So, which kind of leader are you? Share your thoughts in the comments. Let’s rethink leadership together.
share this
Related Articles
Related Articles
The Recognition Paradox:
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
Let's talk about the elephant in every startup room: trust. As a founder, you're a visionary, a risk-taker, a relentless force of nature. You've battled against impossible odds, fueled by ambition and a singular vision. These very traits, which propelled you from an idea to a burgeoning business, are often celebrated as the hallmarks of entrepreneurial genius. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: those same strengths, left unchecked, can become the insidious forces that destroy the very trust your startup desperately needs to survive and thrive. Research reveals a stark reality: trust isn't a "nice-to-have" soft skill; it's the indispensable capital that underpins every successful venture. It's the bedrock of high-performing teams, the fuel for innovation, and the hidden engine of organizational resilience. Ignore it at your peril, because the cost of low trust isn't just a dip in morale—it's a direct hit to your bottom line, your talent pipeline, and your legacy as a leader. Trust: The Unseen Currency of the Startup World In the chaotic, high-stakes environment of a startup, trust is amplified. It’s the "first step of genuine and effective leadership” , and without it, people simply won't follow you. This isn't just about warm feelings; it's about hard business metrics. Companies with high trust factors report a staggering 74% less stress, 13% fewer sick days, and 40% less burnout among employees. Employees in high-trust organizations are also 50% more likely to stay long-term , drastically cutting turnover costs and retaining invaluable institutional knowledge. When trust flourishes, collaboration ignites, leading to more innovative solutions and superior problem-solving. Google's own Project Aristotle, a deep dive into team effectiveness, concluded that high-performing teams are simply impossible without trust. This is the "Founder Effect" in action. Your behavior, whether positive or negative, is magnified due to your central, often singular, role in shaping early-stage culture and strategy. Unlike larger, established corporations, your startup's very DNA is a direct reflection of you. The Three Pillars: Your Trustworthiness Litmus Test Research consistently points to three fundamental pillars of trustworthiness: Ability, Integrity, and Benevolence . Here’s the critical, often misunderstood, part: trustworthiness is a product of these three, not a sum. A zero score in any one pillar results in zero trustworthiness overall . Let that sink in. You can be a brilliant strategist (high Ability), but if your team perceives you as dishonest (zero Integrity), your trust account is empty. You can be the most ethical person in the room (high Integrity), but if you consistently fail to deliver on promises (zero Ability), trust evaporates. And perhaps the most insidious blind spot for many founders: you can be competent and honest, but if you lack genuine care and kindness for your team (zero Benevolence), you will not be trusted. Authenticity is the bedrock upon which these pillars stand. It's about transparency regarding intentions, a willingness to admit mistakes, and an unwavering adherence to your core values. Without genuine authenticity, any attempt at building trust will be perceived as manipulative, leading to skepticism rather than genuine trust. The Startup Crucible: Why Founders Fall Into Traps The startup environment is a unique pressure cooker. High uncertainty, relentless pressure to scale, and limited resources create a volatile landscape. This constant flux demands rapid iteration and quick decision-making. But this urgency can lead to "hasty decisions" and "sub-optimal risk-taking behaviors". This is where "Founder's Syndrome" (or "founderitis") often takes root. It's a pathological pattern where your initial strengths, vital for launching, transform into weaknesses that hinder growth. It's an "autoimmune disease" that ultimately undermines the very organization you worked so hard to build. The journey is often lonely, exacerbating stress and leading to mental health struggles that are 50% more common for founders than the general population. This pervasive stress "clouds judgment" and "hampers long-term planning," directly eroding trust. When you neglect your own mental health, you inadvertently "undermine the importance of the mental health of the people you are leading". The Trust Builders: Founders Who Get It Right Despite the inherent challenges, many founders successfully cultivate deep trust. They understand that it's a deliberate, multi-faceted process rooted in specific leadership qualities and behaviors. 1. Demonstrating Ability and Adaptability: Founders build trust by consistently delivering on promises and demonstrating competence. This means being agile and willing to pivot when necessary, learning from mistakes, and adapting to market shifts. Positive Example: Daniel Dines of UiPath. UiPath, now a $10 billion company, wasn't an overnight success. Founder Daniel Dines navigated multiple major pivots, from an outsourcing company to a consumer products foray that "didn't work," before finally productizing their services into what became UiPath. His willingness to learn from "early missteps and failed attempts" and adapt the business model demonstrated his ability and built trust through resilience and consistent effort. This adaptability reinforces the "Ability" pillar, showing stakeholders that the founder can steer the ship through turbulent waters. 2. Upholding Unwavering Integrity: Integrity is non-negotiable. Founders who "walk the talk"—consistently upholding values, maintaining honesty, and ensuring fairness—build profound trust. Positive Example: A Transparent Tech Startup. One tech startup embraced transparency from day one, openly sharing both successes and challenges with all team members. This commitment fostered a culture of trust, attracting and retaining top talent who valued an environment where their voices were heard and contributions recognized. This transparency, rooted in integrity, empowered employees to propose bold solutions and challenge the status quo, driving sustainable growth. Investors also explicitly expect founders to adhere to both the "letter and the spirit of the law" and to behave ethically. 3. Cultivating Benevolence and Psychological Safety: Trust is deeply relational. Founders who show genuine concern for their team's well-being, demonstrating empathy, respect, and kindness, foster psychological safety. Positive Example: Airbnb's Foundational Trust. When Airbnb launched, convincing strangers to rent out their homes was a massive trust hurdle. Founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia tackled this head-on by prioritizing trust and safety. They implemented rigorous verification processes, secure payment systems, and user reviews. These measures, born from a deep understanding of user concerns and a commitment to their well-being, were crucial in building a safe and reliable platform, fostering a vibrant community, and ultimately disrupting the hospitality industry. This commitment to user and host well-being exemplifies benevolence. The Trust Destroyers: Traps Even the Best Fall Into Even with good intentions, founders can inadvertently erode trust. These behaviors, often amplified by startup pressures, can be catastrophic. 1. Lack of Transparency and Inconsistent Communication: When your actions don't align with your words, credibility fades. Information silos and inconsistent messaging breed distrust. Negative Example: Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook's Data Scandals. Mark Zuckerberg, despite his vision, faced significant trust erosion at Facebook due to a perceived lack of transparency and inconsistent communication regarding user data. Revelations about Cambridge Analytica exposing personal data of 87 million users, followed by admissions of hackers accessing 50 million users' information, and investigations revealing data sharing with major companies like Netflix and Amazon, shattered public and investor trust. This "say-do gap" between stated privacy commitments and actual practices profoundly undermined integrity and transparency. 2. Compromised Integrity and Unethical Conduct: This is the most catastrophic trust destroyer. Unchecked ambition and intense pressure can lead founders to believe "the rules don't apply to them". Negative Example: Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos) and Trevor Milton (Nikola). Elizabeth Holmes's ambition to revolutionize healthcare at Theranos morphed into manipulation and deceit, fabricating capabilities her technology couldn't deliver. This led to investors, employees, and patients suffering the consequences. Similarly, Trevor Milton, founder of Nikola, succumbed to pressure to deliver on promises, leading him to "embellish—no, outright fabricate—the capabilities of Nikola's technology." When the truth emerged, his reputation crumbled, and investors lost millions. These cases vividly illustrate how a fundamental compromise of integrity, driven by ambition and pressure, leads to "shattered credibility" and "burnt bridges". Misleading investors about revenue isn't just unethical; it can be criminal securities fraud with severe legal implications. 3. Absence of Benevolence and Empathy: Neglecting the human element—empathy, respect, and genuine care—is profoundly destructive. Negative Example: Travis Kalanick at Uber. Travis Kalanick, Uber's co-founder, was ultimately forced to resign by an investor revolt due to his "brash and at times inappropriate behavior" that "repeatedly raised eyebrows" and was blamed for creating a "toxic culture". This lack of benevolence, characterized by disrespect and a disregard for employee well-being, directly eroded trust and led to significant talent drain. Publicly humiliating team members, disengaging emotionally, or adopting a "one-size-fits-all" leadership approach with diverse teams all signal a profound lack of care. 4. Micromanagement and Control-Freak Tendencies: This signals a fundamental lack of trust in employees and creates a vicious cycle of distrust. Negative Example: The Bottleneck Founder. Founders who feel the need to oversee every decision create significant bottlenecks, disempowering employees and stifling creativity. Talented team members often leave because they don't feel trusted or valued. Micromanagement explicitly communicates, "I no longer think you are the right person to do this job". This toxic behavior destroys morale, causes employees to delay decisions, and withholds valuable insights. It's a direct attack on the "Ability" pillar of trust, implying incompetence and leading to lower performance, decreased morale, and higher turnover. 5. Impulsivity and Resistance to Adaptation: Constantly shifting priorities or clinging rigidly to outdated methods undermines trust in your ability to lead effectively. Negative Example: The "Analysis Paralysis" Founder. Some founders, despite the need for agility, are "incredibly rigid," preferring "familiar methods" and struggling to let go of past successes. They may suffer from "analysis paralysis" when faced with incomplete information, a common occurrence in startups. This rigidity can manifest as dictatorial behavior and a struggle to accept alternative viewpoints. This stifles innovation, as employees hesitate to propose new ideas if they believe the founder won't be receptive. The Path Forward: Rebuilding and Sustaining Your Trust Capital The good news is that trust, even when broken, can be rebuilt. It requires deliberate, sustained effort and a profound commitment to self-awareness. Lead by Exemplification: Your actions must consistently align with your words. Admit missteps openly and share the steps you're taking to rectify them. This consistent "say-do" message builds profound credibility. Prioritize Open and Consistent Communication: Establish platforms for transparent dialogue, like town hall meetings and regular updates. Actively seek input, schedule regular check-ins, and create safe spaces for genuine dialogue. Cultivate Self-Awareness and Mental Well-being: Address your own fears and psychological traps. Prioritize your mental health, as it directly impacts your judgment, empathy, and ability to lead effectively. Foster Psychological Safety: Normalize failure as part of growth, encourage open dialogue, and reward calculated risks . This creates an environment where employees feel secure enough to challenge the status quo, admit mistakes, and contribute new ideas. Empower and Delegate: Move beyond micromanagement. Clearly define ownership, empower teams to make decisions, and model trust by delegating effectively . Embrace Adaptability and Humility: Be willing to pivot and learn from mistakes. When you demonstrate the humility to adjust strategy, it reinforces trust in your leadership and judgment. The Ultimate Competitive Advantage Trust is not merely a desirable attribute; it is the fundamental bedrock of high-performing, resilient organizations. Unequivocally demonstrates that founders who prioritize and actively cultivate trust unlock unparalleled levels of employee engagement, productivity, innovation, and overall organizational success. Your journey as a founder is fraught with challenges, but the most formidable ones often come from within. By consistently embodying competence, upholding ethics, and demonstrating genuine care, while actively mitigating the psychological traps and pressures inherent in the entrepreneurial journey, you can build and sustain the high-trust environments essential for navigating today's complex business landscape and achieving long-term, sustainable growth. Trust, in essence, is your ultimate competitive advantage. Are you ready to wield it?
The Trust Advantage: Build It or Break It
