Article

The Three Pillars of Leadership: Unlocking the Secret to Organizational Success

September 3, 2024
Three Pillars of Leadership image

In business, success is a complex puzzle, and the most significant pieces are not just financial acumen or market opportunities—they are the leaders at the helm. I’ve spent decades dissecting what makes some leaders soar while others crash and burn. My research has revealed a one important conclusion: effective leadership is built on three fundamental pillars—The Visionary Evangelist, The Relationship Builder, and The Manager of Execution. These pillars are not just styles but skill sets that are the very lifeblood of an organization. If you want to understand why some companies thrive and others fade into obscurity, look no further.


The Visionary Evangelist: The Dreamer Who Dares

Where there is no vision, the people perish—or at least, the company does. The Visionary Evangelist is the leader who sees the world not as it is, but as it could be. These are the Steve Jobs, Elon Musks, and Thomas Edisons of the world—people who, from the outside, seem to have been born with a prophetic ability to foresee the future. They don’t just think outside the box; they burn the box to ashes and build something entirely new.


Strengths:
The brilliance of a Visionary Evangelist lies in their unshakable belief in the impossible. They are the ones who can turn a seemingly absurd idea into a billion-dollar enterprise. Visionary Evangelists possess a magnetic charisma that draws people in and a relentless drive that pushes them to pursue their dreams no matter the obstacles. Their creativity is boundless, their energy infectious, and their ability to rally a team around a common goal is nothing short of miraculous.


Weaknesses:
But here’s the catch—Visionary Evangelists are often their own worst enemies. Their genius comes with a dark side. They are notoriously terrible at the mundane but crucial aspects of running a business. Details? Boring. Processes? Stifling. Execution? Someone else’s problem. This is why so many startups led by visionary founders stumble when it’s time to scale. They are brilliant at sparking the flame but terrible at keeping the fire burning. Their lack of focus on execution can turn a promising venture into a chaotic mess. In short, Visionary Evangelists can light up the world with their ideas, but without a solid team to catch and contain that lightning, they’re likely to burn the house down.


The Relationship Builder: The Glue That Binds

In the cutthroat world of business today, where competition is fierce and the stakes are high, it’s easy to forget that companies are not just collections of assets—they are communities of people. Enter the Relationship Builder, the leader who understands that the strength of any organization lies in the bonds between its members. These leaders are the unsung heroes, the empathetic souls who quietly keep the ship sailing smoothly by ensuring that everyone feels valued and heard.


Strengths:
Relationship Builders are the emotional glue of any organization. They are the ones who know every employee’s birthday, who can defuse a tense meeting with a well-timed joke, and who instinctively understand what makes each team member tick. In a world increasingly dominated by remote work and digital communication, these leaders are more vital than ever. They are the ones who create a culture of trust and collaboration, who make people want to come to work every day, even when the work itself is challenging.


But don’t be fooled by their soft touch—Relationship Builders have a powerful impact. They are the reason people stay with a company through tough times, the ones who turn a group of employees into a true team. They are the heart and soul of an organization, ensuring that the people who make up the company are connected, motivated, and ready to go the extra mile.


For example, think about Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, who transformed the company’s culture by emphasizing empathy, collaboration, and a growth mindset. Under his leadership, Microsoft has shifted from a cutthroat, competitive environment to one where teamwork and inclusivity are prioritized, leading to significant business success. Another great example of a Relationship Builder is Tony Hsieh, the late CEO of Zappos. Hsieh was known for his extraordinary emphasis on company culture and employee happiness, which he believed were key to the success of the business. His leadership style was built on trust, open communication, and fostering strong relationships within the organization


Weaknesses:
However, the very traits that make Relationship Builders so effective can also be their downfall. Their deep empathy and desire to avoid conflict can make them indecisive and overly accommodating. They may struggle with holding people accountable, fearing that tough love might damage relationships. In the pressure cooker of startup life, this can lead to a lack of discipline and accountability that undermines the entire organization. They can be so focused on keeping everyone happy that they lose sight of the bigger picture, becoming reluctant to make the hard decisions that leadership sometimes demands. In short, they can be too nice for their own good.


The Manager of Execution: The No-Nonsense Operator

If Visionary Evangelists are the spark and Relationship Builders the glue, then Managers of Execution are the gears that keep the machine running. They are the pragmatic, detail-oriented leaders who take the grand ideas of the Visionary Evangelist and turn them into reality. These are the unsung warriors of the business world—the ones who ensure that the trains run on time, that budgets are met, and that projects are delivered with precision.


Think about Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors, as an example. Barra’s focus on execution and operational excellence has driven GM through a significant transformation, including the aggressive push towards electric vehicles. Her disciplined approach has helped GM stay competitive in an industry undergoing rapid change. Another modern example is Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, who succeeded Steve Jobs. While Jobs was the quintessential Visionary Evangelist, Cook is the epitome of a Manager of Execution. His meticulous attention to supply chain management and operational efficiency has allowed Apple to maintain its status as one of the most valuable companies in the world, even after the passing of its iconic founder


Strengths:
Managers of Execution are the backbone of any successful organization. They bring order to chaos, discipline to creativity, and focus to ambition. They are the ones who see the world in terms of processes, plans, and measurable outcomes. They are relentless in their pursuit of efficiency and are not afraid to make the tough decisions necessary to keep the organization on track. Their greatest strength is their ability to take a high-level vision and break it down into actionable steps that can be executed with military precision.


In the startup world, where the chaos of rapid growth can easily overwhelm even the best ideas, Managers of Execution are the ones who keep the ship from capsizing. They are the ones who ensure that deadlines are met, that resources are allocated efficiently, and that the organization remains financially viable. Without them, even the most brilliant startup is doomed to flounder.


Weaknesses:
But like the other pillars, Managers of Execution have their Achilles’ heel. Their focus on efficiency and control can lead them to become micromanagers, stifling creativity and innovation in their quest for order. They may become so obsessed with process that they lose sight of the ultimate goal, turning into bureaucrats rather than leaders. Their insistence on following the plan can make them inflexible and resistant to change, which is deadly in a fast-paced, dynamic environment. Moreover, their tendency to prioritize tasks over people can lead to a toxic work environment where employees feel like cogs in a machine rather than valued members of a team.


Why All Three Pillars Matter

Here’s the ultimate my 40 years of research has uncovered: no single pillar is enough. The Visionary Evangelist, the Relationship Builder, and the Manager of Execution are all essential to the success of any organization, but each brings unique strengths and corresponding weaknesses. An organization led solely by a Visionary Evangelist may blaze bright but burn out quickly, undone by its inability to execute. A company dominated by Relationship Builders may be a great place to work but could falter without a clear vision or the discipline to deliver results. And a firm run by Managers of Execution may be efficient but soulless, marching toward mediocrity rather than greatness.


This is why the most successful organizations are those that cultivate all three pillars. It’s about balance. A great company needs the visionary spark to inspire, the relational glue to bind, and the operational rigor to execute. Each pillar supports the others, compensating for their weaknesses and amplifying their strengths.


The Founder’s Dilemma

For founders, this balance is particularly crucial—and particularly challenging. Founders often excel as Visionary Evangelists, brimming with ideas and passion. But as their companies grow, the skills that made them successful in the early days—creativity, risk-taking, relentless energy—can become liabilities. Without the execution skills to scale operations or the relational skills to build a cohesive team, even the most brilliant founders can find themselves at the helm of a sinking ship.


This is why many startups struggle to transition from a scrappy, innovative startup to a sustainable, growing company. Founders must either develop the other pillars or, more realistically, bring in leaders who can complement their strengths. The best founders are those who recognize their limitations and surround themselves with a team that can fill in the gaps.


Leadership in Larger Organizations

As companies grow, the need for leaders who embody all three pillars becomes even more critical. In a large organization, it’s not enough to be a visionary or a people person or an operational expert—you need to be all three, or at least understand how to lead a team that covers all these bases. Leaders who can only see through the lens of one pillar are doomed to fail in the complex, multifaceted world of big business.


The best leaders are those who can switch between these styles as the situation demands, who can dream big, connect deeply with their team, and deliver results—all at the same time. It’s a tall order, but those who can master this trifecta are the ones who leave a lasting legacy.


The Path to Lasting Success

The Three Pillars of Leadership offer a roadmap for building a successful organization, but they also serve as a warning. Lean too heavily on any one pillar, and your organization may crumble. The real power lies in balance—in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each leadership style and ensuring that your team has all three pillars represented.

For founders and leaders alike, the message is clear: embrace your strengths, but don’t ignore your weaknesses. Surround yourself with people who can do what you can’t, and you’ll build an organization that’s not just successful but unstoppable. In the end, it’s not just about being a visionary, a connector, or an operator—it’s about being all of them, or knowing how to lead a team that is.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

e
By Rich Hagberg August 9, 2025
Introduction: The Brutal Truth About Change If you’re leading a company, here’s one brutal truth you can’t dodge: resistance to change isn’t just inevitable—it’s a gift. Most leaders don’t see it that way. They treat it like an obstacle to bulldoze, something to out-argue, out-maneuver, or silence. But resistance, if you know how to read it, is a living, breathing diagnostic tool. Every objection, every sideways comment in a hallway, every moment of awkward silence in a meeting—it’s all data. It tells you where the trust gaps are, where the communication breakdowns have happened, and where your people’s unspoken fears live. If you ignore that data, you’re flying blind. The hard numbers back this up: more than 70% of organizational change initiatives fail, not because the strategy was flawed, but because leaders underestimated what it would take to guide people through the emotional turbulence of transformation. If you want your next big initiative to succeed, the shift starts here: stop seeing resistance as the enemy, and start listening to what it’s telling you. When you do, you’ll discover that resistance isn’t a wall to break down—it’s a map showing you exactly where to go next. 1. Rethink Resistance: It’s Data, Not Defiance Let’s flip the lens. When people resist, they’re rarely doing it for sport. They’re sending up flares. They’re telling you something’s unclear, untested, or untrusted. For example, I worked with a CEO rolling out a sweeping technology overhaul. His first instinct when his managers hesitated was frustration—until we sat down and dissected the resistance. It turned out the managers weren’t doubting the technology; they were worried about the gap between the training timeline and the rollout date. They didn’t fear change—they feared being set up to fail.  When you stop labeling resistance as “non-compliance” and start treating it like intelligence gathering, you find it points to the very levers you can pull to move the change forward.
How
By Rich Hagberg August 1, 2025
Most startup founders are brilliant at innovation, disruption, and blazing new trails. They're visionaries, incredibly driven, and fiercely independent. Unfortunately, those same powerful traits often sabotage their ability to foster genuine collaboration—a critical ingredient in startup success. I've spent decades coaching founders, and one of the biggest blind spots I've observed is the gap between what founders naturally do well and what's required to create truly collaborative cultures. Understanding these tendencies—and knowing how to counter them—can mean the difference between startup stagnation and breakout growth. High Independence, Low Collaboration Founders thrive on independence. They love breaking rules, ignoring boundaries, and pushing limits. But independence can quickly morph into isolation. The very idea of slowing down to seek consensus or accommodate team input feels restrictive, even suffocating. Implications: This independent streak inadvertently sidelines team members, suppresses input, and reduces engagement. Talented people quickly learn their ideas don't matter, and teams become passive or defensive. Actions to Counter: Practice deliberately inclusive decision-making. Clearly define which decisions you'll make alone and where you'll solicit team input. Regularly check in to see if team members feel heard and involved. Dominance Isn’t Always Dominant Many founders naturally take a commanding stance. Their assertiveness, directness, and forcefulness can spark initial progress but, over time, it creates resistance. When team members feel steamrolled or fearful of speaking up, creativity vanishes. Implications: A dominant style shuts down communication, makes feedback difficult, and kills the very collaboration needed for sustained innovation. Actions to Counter: Make intentional space for quieter team members to speak. Foster psychological safety by modeling vulnerability and humility Balance assertiveness with curiosity—actively seek feedback rather than waiting for it. The Curse of Poor Delegation Delegation isn't just handing off tasks—it's handing off trust. But founders notoriously struggle with this, often believing only they can execute properly. Every task not delegated reinforces the message that the team isn’t capable. Implications: Poor delegation creates bottlenecks, slows execution, and demoralizes talented employees who feel undervalued and micromanaged. Actions to Counter: Start small by delegating lower-risk tasks clearly and thoroughly. Regularly check your impulses to micromanage; remind yourself why you hired capable people. Invest in mentoring and coaching rather than controlling. Communication Breakdown Founders are famously impatient. They think fast, act fast, and often communicate quickly or incompletely. What seems obvious to them might be totally unclear to their team. Implications: Poor communication creates ambiguity, confusion, and frustration, grinding collaboration to a halt. Teams waste energy guessing expectations rather than innovating. Actions to Counter: Slow down to clearly articulate the "why" behind your decisions. Confirm understanding by asking team members to reflect back their interpretations. Regularly solicit feedback on your communication style and clarity. Arrogance: The Silent Collaboration Killer Confidence is crucial. But confidence unchecked can veer into arrogance, leading founders to dismiss feedback, overlook critical insights, and alienate key contributors. Implications: Arrogance destroys trust, stifles dialogue, and creates a toxic environment where collaboration is impossible. Actions to Counter: Intentionally invite critique and respond openly and constructively. Regularly acknowledge your mistakes publicly to model humility. Actively seek alternative viewpoints before finalizing decisions. Conflict Avoidance (or Aggression) Many founders fall into two extreme camps: conflict avoiders or conflict initiators. Both extremes are deadly to collaboration. Avoiding conflict leaves critical issues unresolved. Aggressive conflict handling creates resentment and fear. Implications: Poorly managed conflict erodes team cohesion, undermines trust, and can spiral into prolonged dysfunction. Actions to Counter: Establish clear, structured conflict resolution processes. Practice direct yet respectful conflict conversations. Use neutral facilitation for emotionally charged discussions. Systems Thinking vs. Reactive Planning Startups prize agility and adaptability. But too much short-term thinking neglects the processes and structures that sustain collaboration. Without clear systems, teams fall into chaos. Implications: Reactive planning leads to burnout, inefficiency, and frustration as team members constantly fight fires rather than building strategically. Actions to Counter: Balance short-term agility with consistent investment in systems and clear processes. Regularly revisit and improve structures as your company scales. Empower process-oriented thinkers in your organization to build effective systems. Workaholism and Burnout Culture Founders set the pace. But when founders turn workaholic, they unknowingly create an environment of exhaustion, anxiety, and diminished psychological safety. Exhausted teams are seldom collaborative. Implications: Productivity drops, innovation dries up, and talented employees start to leave. Actions to Counter: Actively model sustainable work-life balance. Publicly recognize and reward collaborative, balanced behaviors. Regularly monitor signs of burnout and intervene early. Ambiguity Isn’t Always Your Friend Founders typically tolerate ambiguity better than most. But your team needs clarity and direction. Too much ambiguity creates stress and undermines collaborative execution. Implications: Team paralysis, lack of initiative, and increased frustration. Actions to Counter: Clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Regularly ask your team what clarity they need to be effective. Balance your tolerance for ambiguity with your team’s genuine need for guidance. The Collaboration Paradox Founders face a paradox. The same traits that fuel their success—independence, assertiveness, rapid execution—also sabotage the collaborative environments crucial for scaling. Acknowledging this paradox is the first step. The second is intentionally adopting behaviors that might feel unnatural at first: fostering inclusive communication, delegating with trust, managing conflict constructively, investing in systems thinking, and balancing your independent streak with genuine empathy.  The good news? These skills are learnable. Great founders don’t have to become entirely different people; they simply need to expand their toolkit. Start today by picking just one area and committing to small, consistent improvements. Your team and your startup—will thank you.
The Recognition Paradox: 
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
By Rich Hagberg July 31, 2025
The Recognition Paradox: Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
ALL ARTICLES