Article

Virtual Chaos: How to Stop Dysfunctional Behavior in Remote Meetings

September 6, 2024

Don’t Let Dysfunction Destroy Your Remote Meetings

Welcome to the New Battlefield—Your Remote Meeting

Your team may be scattered across different time zones, sitting in their home offices, but the battleground for productivity remains the same: your virtual meeting room. Unlike the physical office, where you can catch subtle cues and pull someone aside for a quick chat, remote meetings come with their own set of unique challenges. And when dysfunction strikes in this digital environment, the impact is amplified. If you’re noticing more tension, disengagement, or outright chaos in your remote meetings, it’s time to take action—before your team’s potential is completely derailed.


The Hidden Dangers of Disconnection—Why Remote Teams Struggle

Remote work has its perks—flexibility, no commute, the comfort of home—but it also comes with significant risks, particularly when it comes to team cohesion. When team members are miles apart, the sense of connection that naturally forms in an office can quickly deteriorate. This disconnection doesn’t just make meetings awkward; it lays the groundwork for dysfunctional behavior.


In remote meetings, the lack of physical presence makes it easier for participants to disengage, misunderstand each other, or hide behind technology to avoid confrontation. Miscommunication becomes rampant, and small issues that could have been resolved with a quick in-person conversation snowball into major conflicts. Before you know it, your meetings have devolved into unproductive sessions where dysfunction is the norm.


Dysfunction in the Digital Age—The New Rules of Engagement

The first step in combating dysfunctional behavior in remote meetings is to establish clear rules of engagement tailored to the virtual environment. Traditional meeting norms don’t always translate well to video calls, where technical issues, time delays, and the lack of non-verbal cues can lead to frustration and confusion.


  • Set Clear Expectations: Remote meetings require even more structure than in-person ones. Distribute a detailed agenda in advance, and make sure everyone knows what’s expected of them. Clarify who should speak and when, and establish norms for muting microphones, using the chat function, and sharing screens.


  • Cameras On, Distractions Off: In a virtual setting, it’s easy to hide behind a turned-off camera and multitask. To foster accountability and engagement, make it a rule that cameras should be on unless there’s a good reason otherwise. This helps recreate some of the social pressure of an in-person meeting, making it harder for participants to tune out.


  • Facilitate Active Participation: Without the natural flow of in-person conversation, it’s easy for remote meetings to be dominated by one or two voices. Use features like the “raise hand” button, or go around the virtual room to ensure everyone has a chance to contribute. Encourage quieter members to speak up and actively manage any over-talking.


The Digital Disruptors—Common Dysfunctional Behaviors in Remote Meetings

Dysfunctional behaviors that were once subtle in in-person meetings can become glaringly obvious in a remote setting. Here’s how to identify and address them:


  1. The Invisible Participant: This is the person who shows up to the meeting but contributes nothing. They might be dealing with distractions, or they might simply be disengaged. To counter this, directly ask for their input or assign specific roles or tasks during the meeting. This encourages them to stay engaged and participate actively.
  2. The Over-Talker: In remote meetings, some people may feel the need to dominate the conversation, perhaps to compensate for the lack of physical presence. This can stifle others and lead to frustration. To manage this, set time limits for individual contributions, and rotate speaking opportunities to ensure balanced participation.
  3. The Technical Blamer: Some participants might frequently blame technical issues—like a bad connection or audio problems—for their lack of engagement. While technical difficulties are real, they can also become a convenient excuse for disengagement. Encourage participants to test their equipment before meetings and have a backup plan in place, like dial-in options, to mitigate these issues.
  4. The Side-Chatter: Private chats during a meeting can create silos and exclude others from important conversations. To prevent this, set a rule that all relevant discussions should happen in the main chat or aloud. This keeps the conversation transparent and inclusive.


Bringing Focus Back—How to Refocus a Derailing Remote Meeting

Even with the best-laid plans, remote meetings can sometimes go off the rails. Here’s how to get things back on track:


  1. Refocus the Agenda: If the conversation strays off-topic, gently steer it back to the agenda. You can say something like, “This is an important point, but let’s park it for now and come back to it if we have time at the end.”
  2. Address Conflict Directly: If tensions are rising or disagreements are becoming personal, don’t ignore it. Address the conflict head-on by acknowledging the differing opinions and suggesting a way forward. For example, you might say, “It seems like we have different perspectives on this. Let’s take a moment to hear both sides and then decide how to proceed.”
  3. Use Breakout Rooms: If the meeting is too large or the discussion is getting unwieldy, use breakout rooms to divide participants into smaller groups. This can make the conversation more manageable and give everyone a chance to speak.


The Long-Term Fix—Building a Culture of Accountability in Remote Teams

Stopping dysfunctional behavior in remote meetings isn’t just about quick fixes; it requires building a culture of accountability and engagement over the long term. Here’s how:


  • Regular Check-Ins: Schedule regular one-on-one check-ins with team members to address any concerns or frustrations before they spill over into meetings. These conversations can help you identify and address issues early.


  • Feedback Loops: Create a culture where feedback is both given and received regularly. After meetings, solicit feedback on what went well and what could be improved. Use this input to adjust your approach to future meetings.


  • Celebrate Successes: Don’t forget to acknowledge and celebrate when things go right. Whether it’s a successful meeting or a particularly productive discussion, recognizing these moments can reinforce positive behavior and encourage more of the same.


Conclusion: Don’t Let Dysfunction Destroy Your Remote Meetings

Remote work is here to stay, and with it, the challenges of running effective virtual meetings. Dysfunctional behavior in these settings can quickly derail productivity, undermine team cohesion, and lead to frustration all around. But by setting clear expectations, fostering active participation, and addressing issues head-on, you can stop dysfunction before it takes hold.


Remember, your remote meetings are a reflection of your team’s overall health. By taking steps to ensure they run smoothly, you’re not just preventing dysfunction—you’re setting your team up for long-term success in a digital world.


Don’t let virtual chaos take over; take control of your meetings and watch your team thrive.

share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

The Courage to Confront: How Real Leaders Balance Candor and Care
By Rich Hagberg December 16, 2025
(Part 2 of The Best Leaders Playbook — Building Trust Systems Series)
Integrity as an Innovation Strategy: Why Moral Clarity Drives Creativity, Not Just Compliance
By Rich Hagberg December 9, 2025
(Part 1 of The Best Leaders Playbook — Building Trust Systems Series)
Greatness Lies in the Contradictions: How the Best Leaders Integrate Opposites Instead of Choosing S
By Rich Hagberg December 2, 2025
The Leadership Tightrope If you lead long enough, you start to realize something uncomfortable: everything that makes you effective also threatens to undo you. Your drive becomes impatience. Your confidence becomes stubbornness. Your empathy turns into guilt. The longer you lead, the more you realize that the job isn’t about choosing one trait over another — it’s about learning to carry both. That’s what maturity looks like in leadership. It’s not balance. It’s tension well managed. The False Comfort of Either/Or Most leaders crave clarity. We want rules. Playbooks. Certainty. Should I be tough or kind? Decisive or collaborative? Visionary or practical? The insecure part of the brain hates contradiction. It wants the “right answer.” But leadership lives in the messy middle — the place where both truths exist, and neither feels comfortable. The best leaders aren’t either/or thinkers. They’re both/and navigators. A Story from the Field I once coached a CEO who told me, “I’m torn between holding people accountable and being empathetic.” I said, “Why do you think those are opposites?” He paused, then laughed. “Because it’s easier that way.” Exactly. It’s easier to pick a lane than to learn how to drive in two at once. He eventually realized the real question wasn’t which side to choose, but when and how to lean into each. He became known as “the fairest tough boss in the building.” That’s the magic of integration — toughness with tenderness, vision with realism, clarity with compassion. Why Paradox Feels So Hard Contradictions feel like hypocrisy when you haven’t made peace with your own complexity. If you believe you have to be one consistent version of yourself — confident, decisive, inspiring — then every moment of doubt feels like fraud. But the truth is, great leaders are contradictory because humans are contradictory. You can be grounded and ambitious, humble and proud, certain and still learning. The work is not to eliminate the tension — it’s to get comfortable feeling it. The Psychology Behind It Our brains love binaries because they make the world simple. But complexity — holding opposites — is the mark of advanced thinking. Psychologists call this integrative complexity — the ability to see multiple perspectives and blend them into a coherent approach. It’s not compromise; it’s synthesis. It’s saying, “Both are true, and I can move between them without losing my integrity.” That’s where wisdom lives — in the movement, not the answer. Funny But True A client once told me, “I feel like half monk, half gladiator.” I said, “Congratulations. That means you’re leading.” Because that’s what the job demands: peace and fight, compassion and steel. If you can’t hold both, you end up overusing one until it breaks you. The Cost of One-Dimensional Leadership We’ve all worked for the “results-only” leader — brilliant, efficient, and emotionally tone-deaf. And the “people-first” leader — kind, loyal, and allergic to accountability. Both are exhausting. Both create lopsided cultures. When leaders pick a single identity — visionary, disciplinarian, nurturer, driver — they lose range. They become caricatures of their strengths. True greatness comes from emotional range, not purity. The Paradox Mindset Here’s how integrative leaders think differently: They value principles over preferences. They can be decisive without being defensive. They know empathy isn’t weakness and toughness isn’t cruelty. They trade perfection for adaptability. They’re the ones who can zoom in and out — from the numbers to the people, from the details to the meaning — without losing coherence. They’re not consistent in behavior. They’re consistent in values. That’s the difference. How to Practice Both/And Thinking Spot your overused strength. The strength that’s hurting you most is the one you lean on too much. If you’re decisive, try listening longer. If you’re compassionate, try being direct faster. Ask, “What’s the opposite quality trying to teach me?” Impatience teaches urgency; patience teaches perspective. You need both. Invite your opposite. Bring someone onto your team who balances your extremes — not a mirror, a counterweight. Hold paradox out loud. Tell your team, “This decision has tension in it — and that’s okay.” Modeling that normalizes complexity for everyone else. A Moment of Self-Honesty I’ve spent decades watching leaders chase “clarity” like it’s peace. But peace doesn’t come from eliminating tension. It comes from trusting yourself inside it. Once you accept that leadership will always feel contradictory, you stop fighting it — and start flowing with it. You don’t need to be the calmest, toughest, or most visionary person in the room. You just need to be the one who can stay whole while the world pulls you in opposite directions. Your Challenge This Week When you catch yourself thinking, “Should I be X or Y?” — stop. Ask instead, “How can I be both?” Then practice it in one small moment. Be kind and firm. Bold and humble. Fast and thoughtful. That’s where growth hides — in the discomfort between two truths. Final Word The best leaders aren’t balanced. They’re integrated. They’ve stopped trying to erase their contradictions and started using them as fuel. They’ve learned that leadership isn’t about certainty. It’s about capacity — the capacity to hold complexity without losing your center. That’s not chaos. That’s mastery.
ALL ARTICLES