Article
Virtual Chaos: How to Stop Dysfunctional Behavior in Remote Meetings
September 6, 2024
Don’t Let Dysfunction Destroy Your Remote Meetings
Welcome to the New Battlefield—Your Remote Meeting
Your team may be scattered across different time zones, sitting in their home offices, but the battleground for productivity remains the same: your virtual meeting room. Unlike the physical office, where you can catch subtle cues and pull someone aside for a quick chat, remote meetings come with their own set of unique challenges. And when dysfunction strikes in this digital environment, the impact is amplified. If you’re noticing more tension, disengagement, or outright chaos in your remote meetings, it’s time to take action—before your team’s potential is completely derailed.
The Hidden Dangers of Disconnection—Why Remote Teams Struggle
Remote work has its perks—flexibility, no commute, the comfort of home—but it also comes with significant risks, particularly when it comes to team cohesion. When team members are miles apart, the sense of connection that naturally forms in an office can quickly deteriorate. This disconnection doesn’t just make meetings awkward; it lays the groundwork for dysfunctional behavior.
In remote meetings, the lack of physical presence makes it easier for participants to disengage, misunderstand each other, or hide behind technology to avoid confrontation. Miscommunication becomes rampant, and small issues that could have been resolved with a quick in-person conversation snowball into major conflicts. Before you know it, your meetings have devolved into unproductive sessions where dysfunction is the norm.
Dysfunction in the Digital Age—The New Rules of Engagement
The first step in combating dysfunctional behavior in remote meetings is to establish clear rules of engagement tailored to the virtual environment. Traditional meeting norms don’t always translate well to video calls, where technical issues, time delays, and the lack of non-verbal cues can lead to frustration and confusion.
- Set Clear Expectations: Remote meetings require even more structure than in-person ones. Distribute a detailed agenda in advance, and make sure everyone knows what’s expected of them. Clarify who should speak and when, and establish norms for muting microphones, using the chat function, and sharing screens.
- Cameras On, Distractions Off: In a virtual setting, it’s easy to hide behind a turned-off camera and multitask. To foster accountability and engagement, make it a rule that cameras should be on unless there’s a good reason otherwise. This helps recreate some of the social pressure of an in-person meeting, making it harder for participants to tune out.
- Facilitate Active Participation: Without the natural flow of in-person conversation, it’s easy for remote meetings to be dominated by one or two voices. Use features like the “raise hand” button, or go around the virtual room to ensure everyone has a chance to contribute. Encourage quieter members to speak up and actively manage any over-talking.
The Digital Disruptors—Common Dysfunctional Behaviors in Remote Meetings
Dysfunctional behaviors that were once subtle in in-person meetings can become glaringly obvious in a remote setting. Here’s how to identify and address them:
- The Invisible Participant: This is the person who shows up to the meeting but contributes nothing. They might be dealing with distractions, or they might simply be disengaged. To counter this, directly ask for their input or assign specific roles or tasks during the meeting. This encourages them to stay engaged and participate actively.
- The Over-Talker: In remote meetings, some people may feel the need to dominate the conversation, perhaps to compensate for the lack of physical presence. This can stifle others and lead to frustration. To manage this, set time limits for individual contributions, and rotate speaking opportunities to ensure balanced participation.
- The Technical Blamer: Some participants might frequently blame technical issues—like a bad connection or audio problems—for their lack of engagement. While technical difficulties are real, they can also become a convenient excuse for disengagement. Encourage participants to test their equipment before meetings and have a backup plan in place, like dial-in options, to mitigate these issues.
- The Side-Chatter: Private chats during a meeting can create silos and exclude others from important conversations. To prevent this, set a rule that all relevant discussions should happen in the main chat or aloud. This keeps the conversation transparent and inclusive.
Bringing Focus Back—How to Refocus a Derailing Remote Meeting
Even with the best-laid plans, remote meetings can sometimes go off the rails. Here’s how to get things back on track:
- Refocus the Agenda: If the conversation strays off-topic, gently steer it back to the agenda. You can say something like, “This is an important point, but let’s park it for now and come back to it if we have time at the end.”
- Address Conflict Directly: If tensions are rising or disagreements are becoming personal, don’t ignore it. Address the conflict head-on by acknowledging the differing opinions and suggesting a way forward. For example, you might say, “It seems like we have different perspectives on this. Let’s take a moment to hear both sides and then decide how to proceed.”
- Use Breakout Rooms: If the meeting is too large or the discussion is getting unwieldy, use breakout rooms to divide participants into smaller groups. This can make the conversation more manageable and give everyone a chance to speak.
The Long-Term Fix—Building a Culture of Accountability in Remote Teams
Stopping dysfunctional behavior in remote meetings isn’t just about quick fixes; it requires building a culture of accountability and engagement over the long term. Here’s how:
- Regular Check-Ins: Schedule regular one-on-one check-ins with team members to address any concerns or frustrations before they spill over into meetings. These conversations can help you identify and address issues early.
- Feedback Loops: Create a culture where feedback is both given and received regularly. After meetings, solicit feedback on what went well and what could be improved. Use this input to adjust your approach to future meetings.
- Celebrate Successes: Don’t forget to acknowledge and celebrate when things go right. Whether it’s a successful meeting or a particularly productive discussion, recognizing these moments can reinforce positive behavior and encourage more of the same.
Conclusion: Don’t Let Dysfunction Destroy Your Remote Meetings
Remote work is here to stay, and with it, the challenges of running effective virtual meetings. Dysfunctional behavior in these settings can quickly derail productivity, undermine team cohesion, and lead to frustration all around. But by setting clear expectations, fostering active participation, and addressing issues head-on, you can stop dysfunction before it takes hold.
Remember, your remote meetings are a reflection of your team’s overall health. By taking steps to ensure they run smoothly, you’re not just preventing dysfunction—you’re setting your team up for long-term success in a digital world.
Don’t let virtual chaos take over; take control of your meetings and watch your team thrive.
share this
Related Articles
Related Articles
The Recognition Paradox:
Why Truly Outstanding Leaders Thrive by Indifference to Personal Glory
Let's talk about the elephant in every startup room: trust. As a founder, you're a visionary, a risk-taker, a relentless force of nature. You've battled against impossible odds, fueled by ambition and a singular vision. These very traits, which propelled you from an idea to a burgeoning business, are often celebrated as the hallmarks of entrepreneurial genius. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: those same strengths, left unchecked, can become the insidious forces that destroy the very trust your startup desperately needs to survive and thrive. Research reveals a stark reality: trust isn't a "nice-to-have" soft skill; it's the indispensable capital that underpins every successful venture. It's the bedrock of high-performing teams, the fuel for innovation, and the hidden engine of organizational resilience. Ignore it at your peril, because the cost of low trust isn't just a dip in morale—it's a direct hit to your bottom line, your talent pipeline, and your legacy as a leader. Trust: The Unseen Currency of the Startup World In the chaotic, high-stakes environment of a startup, trust is amplified. It’s the "first step of genuine and effective leadership” , and without it, people simply won't follow you. This isn't just about warm feelings; it's about hard business metrics. Companies with high trust factors report a staggering 74% less stress, 13% fewer sick days, and 40% less burnout among employees. Employees in high-trust organizations are also 50% more likely to stay long-term , drastically cutting turnover costs and retaining invaluable institutional knowledge. When trust flourishes, collaboration ignites, leading to more innovative solutions and superior problem-solving. Google's own Project Aristotle, a deep dive into team effectiveness, concluded that high-performing teams are simply impossible without trust. This is the "Founder Effect" in action. Your behavior, whether positive or negative, is magnified due to your central, often singular, role in shaping early-stage culture and strategy. Unlike larger, established corporations, your startup's very DNA is a direct reflection of you. The Three Pillars: Your Trustworthiness Litmus Test Research consistently points to three fundamental pillars of trustworthiness: Ability, Integrity, and Benevolence . Here’s the critical, often misunderstood, part: trustworthiness is a product of these three, not a sum. A zero score in any one pillar results in zero trustworthiness overall . Let that sink in. You can be a brilliant strategist (high Ability), but if your team perceives you as dishonest (zero Integrity), your trust account is empty. You can be the most ethical person in the room (high Integrity), but if you consistently fail to deliver on promises (zero Ability), trust evaporates. And perhaps the most insidious blind spot for many founders: you can be competent and honest, but if you lack genuine care and kindness for your team (zero Benevolence), you will not be trusted. Authenticity is the bedrock upon which these pillars stand. It's about transparency regarding intentions, a willingness to admit mistakes, and an unwavering adherence to your core values. Without genuine authenticity, any attempt at building trust will be perceived as manipulative, leading to skepticism rather than genuine trust. The Startup Crucible: Why Founders Fall Into Traps The startup environment is a unique pressure cooker. High uncertainty, relentless pressure to scale, and limited resources create a volatile landscape. This constant flux demands rapid iteration and quick decision-making. But this urgency can lead to "hasty decisions" and "sub-optimal risk-taking behaviors". This is where "Founder's Syndrome" (or "founderitis") often takes root. It's a pathological pattern where your initial strengths, vital for launching, transform into weaknesses that hinder growth. It's an "autoimmune disease" that ultimately undermines the very organization you worked so hard to build. The journey is often lonely, exacerbating stress and leading to mental health struggles that are 50% more common for founders than the general population. This pervasive stress "clouds judgment" and "hampers long-term planning," directly eroding trust. When you neglect your own mental health, you inadvertently "undermine the importance of the mental health of the people you are leading". The Trust Builders: Founders Who Get It Right Despite the inherent challenges, many founders successfully cultivate deep trust. They understand that it's a deliberate, multi-faceted process rooted in specific leadership qualities and behaviors. 1. Demonstrating Ability and Adaptability: Founders build trust by consistently delivering on promises and demonstrating competence. This means being agile and willing to pivot when necessary, learning from mistakes, and adapting to market shifts. Positive Example: Daniel Dines of UiPath. UiPath, now a $10 billion company, wasn't an overnight success. Founder Daniel Dines navigated multiple major pivots, from an outsourcing company to a consumer products foray that "didn't work," before finally productizing their services into what became UiPath. His willingness to learn from "early missteps and failed attempts" and adapt the business model demonstrated his ability and built trust through resilience and consistent effort. This adaptability reinforces the "Ability" pillar, showing stakeholders that the founder can steer the ship through turbulent waters. 2. Upholding Unwavering Integrity: Integrity is non-negotiable. Founders who "walk the talk"—consistently upholding values, maintaining honesty, and ensuring fairness—build profound trust. Positive Example: A Transparent Tech Startup. One tech startup embraced transparency from day one, openly sharing both successes and challenges with all team members. This commitment fostered a culture of trust, attracting and retaining top talent who valued an environment where their voices were heard and contributions recognized. This transparency, rooted in integrity, empowered employees to propose bold solutions and challenge the status quo, driving sustainable growth. Investors also explicitly expect founders to adhere to both the "letter and the spirit of the law" and to behave ethically. 3. Cultivating Benevolence and Psychological Safety: Trust is deeply relational. Founders who show genuine concern for their team's well-being, demonstrating empathy, respect, and kindness, foster psychological safety. Positive Example: Airbnb's Foundational Trust. When Airbnb launched, convincing strangers to rent out their homes was a massive trust hurdle. Founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia tackled this head-on by prioritizing trust and safety. They implemented rigorous verification processes, secure payment systems, and user reviews. These measures, born from a deep understanding of user concerns and a commitment to their well-being, were crucial in building a safe and reliable platform, fostering a vibrant community, and ultimately disrupting the hospitality industry. This commitment to user and host well-being exemplifies benevolence. The Trust Destroyers: Traps Even the Best Fall Into Even with good intentions, founders can inadvertently erode trust. These behaviors, often amplified by startup pressures, can be catastrophic. 1. Lack of Transparency and Inconsistent Communication: When your actions don't align with your words, credibility fades. Information silos and inconsistent messaging breed distrust. Negative Example: Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook's Data Scandals. Mark Zuckerberg, despite his vision, faced significant trust erosion at Facebook due to a perceived lack of transparency and inconsistent communication regarding user data. Revelations about Cambridge Analytica exposing personal data of 87 million users, followed by admissions of hackers accessing 50 million users' information, and investigations revealing data sharing with major companies like Netflix and Amazon, shattered public and investor trust. This "say-do gap" between stated privacy commitments and actual practices profoundly undermined integrity and transparency. 2. Compromised Integrity and Unethical Conduct: This is the most catastrophic trust destroyer. Unchecked ambition and intense pressure can lead founders to believe "the rules don't apply to them". Negative Example: Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos) and Trevor Milton (Nikola). Elizabeth Holmes's ambition to revolutionize healthcare at Theranos morphed into manipulation and deceit, fabricating capabilities her technology couldn't deliver. This led to investors, employees, and patients suffering the consequences. Similarly, Trevor Milton, founder of Nikola, succumbed to pressure to deliver on promises, leading him to "embellish—no, outright fabricate—the capabilities of Nikola's technology." When the truth emerged, his reputation crumbled, and investors lost millions. These cases vividly illustrate how a fundamental compromise of integrity, driven by ambition and pressure, leads to "shattered credibility" and "burnt bridges". Misleading investors about revenue isn't just unethical; it can be criminal securities fraud with severe legal implications. 3. Absence of Benevolence and Empathy: Neglecting the human element—empathy, respect, and genuine care—is profoundly destructive. Negative Example: Travis Kalanick at Uber. Travis Kalanick, Uber's co-founder, was ultimately forced to resign by an investor revolt due to his "brash and at times inappropriate behavior" that "repeatedly raised eyebrows" and was blamed for creating a "toxic culture". This lack of benevolence, characterized by disrespect and a disregard for employee well-being, directly eroded trust and led to significant talent drain. Publicly humiliating team members, disengaging emotionally, or adopting a "one-size-fits-all" leadership approach with diverse teams all signal a profound lack of care. 4. Micromanagement and Control-Freak Tendencies: This signals a fundamental lack of trust in employees and creates a vicious cycle of distrust. Negative Example: The Bottleneck Founder. Founders who feel the need to oversee every decision create significant bottlenecks, disempowering employees and stifling creativity. Talented team members often leave because they don't feel trusted or valued. Micromanagement explicitly communicates, "I no longer think you are the right person to do this job". This toxic behavior destroys morale, causes employees to delay decisions, and withholds valuable insights. It's a direct attack on the "Ability" pillar of trust, implying incompetence and leading to lower performance, decreased morale, and higher turnover. 5. Impulsivity and Resistance to Adaptation: Constantly shifting priorities or clinging rigidly to outdated methods undermines trust in your ability to lead effectively. Negative Example: The "Analysis Paralysis" Founder. Some founders, despite the need for agility, are "incredibly rigid," preferring "familiar methods" and struggling to let go of past successes. They may suffer from "analysis paralysis" when faced with incomplete information, a common occurrence in startups. This rigidity can manifest as dictatorial behavior and a struggle to accept alternative viewpoints. This stifles innovation, as employees hesitate to propose new ideas if they believe the founder won't be receptive. The Path Forward: Rebuilding and Sustaining Your Trust Capital The good news is that trust, even when broken, can be rebuilt. It requires deliberate, sustained effort and a profound commitment to self-awareness. Lead by Exemplification: Your actions must consistently align with your words. Admit missteps openly and share the steps you're taking to rectify them. This consistent "say-do" message builds profound credibility. Prioritize Open and Consistent Communication: Establish platforms for transparent dialogue, like town hall meetings and regular updates. Actively seek input, schedule regular check-ins, and create safe spaces for genuine dialogue. Cultivate Self-Awareness and Mental Well-being: Address your own fears and psychological traps. Prioritize your mental health, as it directly impacts your judgment, empathy, and ability to lead effectively. Foster Psychological Safety: Normalize failure as part of growth, encourage open dialogue, and reward calculated risks . This creates an environment where employees feel secure enough to challenge the status quo, admit mistakes, and contribute new ideas. Empower and Delegate: Move beyond micromanagement. Clearly define ownership, empower teams to make decisions, and model trust by delegating effectively . Embrace Adaptability and Humility: Be willing to pivot and learn from mistakes. When you demonstrate the humility to adjust strategy, it reinforces trust in your leadership and judgment. The Ultimate Competitive Advantage Trust is not merely a desirable attribute; it is the fundamental bedrock of high-performing, resilient organizations. Unequivocally demonstrates that founders who prioritize and actively cultivate trust unlock unparalleled levels of employee engagement, productivity, innovation, and overall organizational success. Your journey as a founder is fraught with challenges, but the most formidable ones often come from within. By consistently embodying competence, upholding ethics, and demonstrating genuine care, while actively mitigating the psychological traps and pressures inherent in the entrepreneurial journey, you can build and sustain the high-trust environments essential for navigating today's complex business landscape and achieving long-term, sustainable growth. Trust, in essence, is your ultimate competitive advantage. Are you ready to wield it?
The Trust Advantage: Build It or Break It
